Use of Lock-In Thermography for non-destructive 3D Defect ... - eufanet

based on 3D simulation SW. • Summary ... Topography and Results based on same data. ▫ no registration ... modeling and calibration .... reference data via Excel spread- ... increased camera speed for 3D analysis via sub-array => fine z; fast.
3MB taille 88 téléchargements 520 vues
Use of Lock-In Thermography for non-destructive 3D Defect Localization on System in Package and Stacked-Die Technology Rudolf Schlangen, S. Motegi, T. Nagatomo, DCG Systems, Fremont, CA, USA C. Schmidt, F. Altmann, Fraunhofer Institute for Mechanics of Materials Halle, Germany H. Murakami, Toshiba, Yokohama, Japan S. Hollingshead, J. West, Texas Instruments, TX, USA A. Reverdy, Sector Technologies, France

1

Outline • Introduction of Lock-In Thermography • Motivation • Case studies on three different 3D defect localization approaches – by local reference points – in combination with 3D X-Ray – based on 3D simulation SW

• Summary 2

Steady-state vs. Lock-in Thermography Steady-state Thermography

Lock-In Thermography

Both images acquired with cooled InSb camera, sensitive from 3-5um at identical DUT power settings 3

Simplified working principle of Real-Time Lock-In Thermography IR-image (V = off)

“on-images” – “off-images”

IR-image (V = on)

(frame rate ≥100Hz) IR Camera

V

detects temperature differences only

tp (flock-in)

t surface

tsurface 0

xy defect localization

t

full lock-in “thermal delay” - defect depth (z)

V 4

Real-Time Pixel-Wise Lock-In Algorithm Vlock-in

heating power flock-in

time multiplication by two weighting factors

stream of incoming images

two Result: in-phase 0°

1

sin(t)



-1

sin(t)*F(t)

F(t)



out of phase -90°

-cos(t)*F(t)

1

-cos(t)

-1

t=1/f frame

Source: O. Breitenstein et al., “Lock-in Thermography”, Springer Verlag 2003

5

Results and Benefits  

sin(t)

All math is applied to every pixel individually and at real time – without acquisition time limit Topography and Results based on same data  no registration error !! Amplitude : - not delay sensitive - good spatial resolution

Phase: - 3D localization - week spots also

-cos(t)

Amp  (0) 2  (90) 2



  arctan 90 0

Source: O. Breitenstein et al., “Lock-in Thermography”, Springer Verlag 2003

6



Increasing LIT acquisition time significantly improves signal-to-noise • The longer the image is acquired, the more accurate / sensitive it becomes • The image may be acquired for as long as is needed • The results continuously updates (every 2 seconds) 7

Motivation - LIT for Package Level FA • Packages are “black-boxes” with multiple possible defect types: 1) in lead-frame removing the package 2) in bond wires may remove the defect 3) internal to the dies • Electrical test often doesn’t provide differentiation => Goal: non-destructive localization and differentiation through the Package A) only 1 => classification by x,y location B) 1 & 3 possible => differentiation via thermal delay t surface C) all three + edge effects more challenging; local reference needed 2 C

A

3

______

B

1 8

Through-Package / Interposer Defect Hot spot location

Current Leak location

DIE

Bad Die

(46 x 37 mm2)

Good Die

PFA revealed a particle, causing a short between VDD and GND inside interposer board. 5x 9

LIT for 3D Defect Localization package surface at t1

Lock-In Excitation Voltage t1

t2

t3

A

t4 Time

B

at t2

at t3

- phase is proportional to defect depth - knowing the material parameters allows to calculate depth of defect - SW for theoretical modeling and calibration

at t4

Surface Temperature above point A point B

∆t ~ ELITE phase result ∆tA

∆tB Time

10

Stacked-Die Analysis - 3D Localization by Direct Comparison •

Clear localization in x & y, but z depth is unknown due to material stack • forward biased IO diode can serve as direct reference points – heat is knowingly generated on the die surface

shorted pin

A

Vlock-in = 80mV, I = 6.2mA,

mould upper die lower die multi-layer leadframe

x

B

flock-in= 2Hz, t ~15min

x, y localization

C – lower die

Vlock-in = 0.8V, I = 1.49mA, flock-in= 10Hz, t ~10min

x

C

B – upper die Vlock-in = 0.75V, I = 1mA,

DUT from TI (TX)

flock-in= 10Hz, t ~10min

11

Stacked-Die Analysis - 3D Localization by Direct Comparison • • •

higher phase-shift equals higher defect depth defect must be below lower die / in uppermost lead frame layer second set of reference measurements (good DUT) shows precise match – data consistent and reproducible =>> Reference measurements only once per technology!! 100

upper die A

lower die x

multi-layer leadframe

x

B

phase

mould

fail upper die lower die upper (ref) lower (ref)

80

60

x

C

40

20

0

DUT from TI (TX)

0

2

4

6

flock-in8 [Hz] 12

10

Package Defect – BGA pin-short • BGA   933Pins • Short between 2 pins Wire

Die



Resin





Substrate Ball

Die bonding contact

Customer tried Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR) followed by high resolution 3D x-ray and failed multiple times









? ? 13

Package Defect – BGA pin-short • consistent localization from front- and backside • lock-in frequency = 1Hz, V = 0.1V,   I ≈ 0.1A, P ≈ 10mW • ELITE acquisition time ~ 1 min (each) x-ray FOV (10x)

frontside

backside 14

3D x-ray Results, Geometrical magnification 10x

magnification too low, defect not resolved yet

15

15

3D x-ray Results, Geometrical magnification 40x

16

16

3D x-ray Results, Geometrical magnification 40x no PFA required, fully non-destructive root cause analysis

touching bond-wires, fused during electrical test

17

17

Time for 3D X-Ray ONLY Volume per high resolution scan (3D @ 40x): ~ 1.35 mm 3 800μm

1300μm

1300μm

full scan takes: > 4 x 4 x 3 x 2h = 96h ≥ 4 Days!! + data analysis time

data acquisition and 3D rendering takes ≥ 2h for the desired resolution ze i s T U D m full m 5 . 6 x m m m 5 m 6. 4 x 2.

!! Initial defect localization required !! 18

18

Stacked-Die Analysis - full 3D, First Results •

Challenges: – parallel bonding => on DUT reference measurements are impossible – too many materials => thermal properties partly unknown (glue layer)



First Customer Results on 8+1 μSD technology (Toshiba Japan)

– meas. at only one lock-in frequency (5Hz) – simple comparison to reference data via Excel spread-sheet – 76% correct, 100% ± 1 layer

#1

712μm

#8

Very promising “first” results! Phase resolution is high enough to localize single layers of 8 die μSD! Goal: improve accuracy, throughput and ease of use 19

Stacked-Die Analysis - improved accuracy & ease of use •

Dedicated SW simulates phase shift per layer – Input layer geometries & material parameters – Adjust based on small number of known reference devices (only once) =>> clear match between theory and results

phase [°]

• •

z-resolution sufficient for 8 layer technology optimizing procedure for improved accuracy

1

simulation model

2

measurements start frequency

die #

bad S NR long a cquisit ion tim #8 e

3 4 5

#1 flock-in [Hz]

20

Stacked-Die Analysis - improved accuracy & ease of use •

Dedicated SW simulates phase shift per layer – Input layer geometries & material parameters – Adjust based on small number of known reference devices (only once) =>> clear match between theory and results

• • •

z-resolution sufficient for 8 layer technology optimizing procedure for improved accuracy Ongoing research collaboration with Fraunhofer IWM, Halle, Germany

• •

matching FOV & DUT size for initial acquisition increased camera speed for 3D analysis via sub-array

=> x, y & rough z => fine z; fast

- improved throughput: custom wide-angle lens max. FOV* 200 x 160mm2

complete PCB board

all 640x512 pixels frame rate = 100Hz * on DCG standard stage setup

1x lens & sub-array complete PCB board e.g. using 64x64 pixels frame rate ~ 950Hz => 9.5 times faster acquisition!

21

Summary / Conclusion •

real-time lock-in thermography for highest sensitivity (< 1W)



allowing through package defect localization



ELITE Phase Data enabling 3D localization – depth accuracy of ± 5% thru homogeneous MC – successful localization in x, y & die for 8-stack SD



combination of LIT & 3D x-ray – fast, high-yield and fully non-destructive “PFA” 22

Thanks for your attention!

23

24

Thru-Package / Defect on DIE ATE driven LIT (exclusive to ELITE) • packaged memory part - 110nm process • high Icc problem (~10mA extra current) • toggling Vdd via dedicated test program (ATE) clearly two separate hotspots, centric to the die => safe to de-package!!

wide angle lens

thru package (low frequency) (2min)

(high frequency)

1x lens

(6min)

(2min)

10x lens root cause: die surface damage (cropped image)

(1min)

(cropped image)

(5min)

(theory & more application examples published at ESREF 2010, R. Schlangen 25et al.)

Thru-Package / Low Ohmic Defect R very low Power dissipation wide angle lens (28mm)

5mm

=> long acquisition => image mosaic undesired • wide angle lens  adjustable field of view  the full DuT can be analyzed at once • macro lens with unsurpassed sensitivity  higher magnification is useless if defects can’t be localized with low mag.

successful localization of package design bug 5mm

PFA: faulty interposer layout macro lens (1x)

- direct short between Vdd and Vss 26