slide

To derive Quantum Theory as Entropic Dynamics and focus on the .... The Big Picture: inference life physics society probability entropy geometry. ... biology: cell,.
206KB taille 3 téléchargements 386 vues
Entropic Time Ariel Caticha Department of Physics University at Albany - SUNY MaxEnt 2010 Chamonix

Question: Do the laws of Physics reflect Laws of Nature?

Or...

Are they rules for processing information about Nature? Our objective: To derive Quantum Theory as Entropic Dynamics and focus on the implications for the theory of time. 2

Step 1: The Statistical Model

Y

hidden variables

y p( y | x)

M

x

X

x

statistical manifold

configuration space with metric γ = δ ab ab σ2 3

Step 1: The Statistical Model

p( y | x)

M

x

X

x

statistical manifold

configuration space with metric γ = δ ab ab σ2 4

Step 2: Entropic Dynamics Maximize

P( x′, y′ | x) S J [ P, Q ] = − ∫ dx′dy′ P ( x′, y′ | x) log Q( x′, y′ | x) uniform

P ( x′ | x ) P p( y′ | x′), x)

∈M Changes happen gradually. Short steps:

〈 ∆2 〉 = 〈γ ab ∆x a ∆x b 〉 = κ 5

The transition probability:

1 1 P( x′ | x) = exp [ S ( x′) − α ( x) ∆2 ] ζ 2 where

p ( y′ | x′) S ( x′) = − ∫ dy′ p( y′ | x′) log q( y′)

6

For short steps:

α P( x′ | x) ∝ exp [− 2 δ ab (∆x a − ∆x a )(∆x b − ∆x b )] 2σ Displacement: Expected drift : Fluctuations:

∆x = ∆x + ∆w 2 σ ∆x a = δ ab ∂ b S ( x) α 2 σ 〈 ∆wa ∆wb 〉 = δ ab α

7

Step 3: Entropic Time The foundation of any notion of time is dynamics. Time is introduced to keep track of the accumulation of many small changes.

P ( x′) = ∫ dx P ( x′, x) = ∫ dx P ( x′ | x) P ( x) (1) Introduce the notion of an instant

ρ ( x′, t ′) = ∫ dx P ( x′ | x) ρ ( x, t ) 8

The Arrow of Entropic Time A time-reversed evolution:

ρ ( x, t ) = ∫ dx′ P ( x | x′) ρ ( x′, t ′) Bayes' theorem

P ( x | x′) =

P( x) P ( x′ | x ) P ( x′)

There is no symmetry between prior and posterior. Entropic time only goes forward. Entropic time vs. physical time? 9

(2) Introduce the notion of interval between instants

For large α the dynamics is all in the fluctuations:

σ ab 〈 ∆w ∆w 〉 = δ α a

b

2

σ 2 ab = ∆t δ τ

Define duration so that motion looks simple:

10

τ α= ∆t

a Fokker-Planck equation: ∂ t ρ = −∂ a ( ρ v ) 2 σ va = ∂ aφ τ

φ ( x, t ) = S ( x) − log ρ 1/ 2 ( x, t )

two components:

va = ba + u a

drift velocity:

2 σ ba = ∂aS τ

osmotic velocity:

2 σ ua = − ∂ a logρ 1/ 2 τ

11

But this is just diffusion, not quantum mechanics! A wave function requires two degrees of freedom. ρ ( x, t )

M

X

φ ( x, t ) = S ( x, t ) − logρ 1/ 2 ( x, t )

x

x 12

Step 4: Manifold dynamics? "Energy" conservation

[Nelson (1979), Smolin (2006)]

1 1  2 2 E = ∫ d x ρ  m v + m u + V ( x) 2 2  3

where

τ m = 2 σ

13

The result: two coupled equations

1) Fokker-Planck/diffusion equation

ρ = −

 a ∂ ( ρ ∂ aφ ) m

2) energy conservation + diffusion 2 2 2 1/ 2   ∇ ρ 2  φ + (∂ aφ ) + V − =0 1/ 2 2m 2m ρ

14

Combine ρ and φ into

Ψ = ρ 1 / 2 e iφ

∂Ψ 2 2 ∇ Ψ + VΨ to get Quantum Mechanics, i = − ∂t 2m F = ma

and also Classical Mechanics Let

S HJ = φ then

S + 1 (∂ S ) 2 + V = 0 HJ a HJ 2m

 ab 〈 ∆w ∆w 〉 = ∆t δ → 0 m a

b

15

More on Entropic Time A clock follows a classical trajectory.

x3c

t3

x

t2

c 2

"physical" space x1c

t1

16

For the composite system of particle and clock:

x3c

ρ ( x | x3c )

x

ρ ( x | x2c )

c 2

"physical" space x1c

ρ ( x | x1c )

17

Entropic time vs "physical" time? We observe correlations at an instant. We do not observe the "absolute" order of the instants. x3c

ρ ( x | x3c )

x

ρ ( x | x2c )

c 2

"physical" space x1c

ρ ( x | x1c )

Entropic time is all we need. 18

Conclusion: Entropic inference leads to Laws of Physics. It provides an alternative to Action Principles. The t in Laws of Physics is entropic time. The natural order/arrow of inference is entropic time... ...and this is the only time we need.

19

20

The Big Picture:

inference

society

probability entropy geometry...

physics

life

21

An analogy from physics:

initial state of motion.

final state of motion.

Force

 dp Force is whatever induces a change of motion: F = dt 22

Inference is dynamics too!

old beliefs

new beliefs

information

Information is what induces the change in rational beliefs. 23

The Big Picture:

ethics

sociology economics anthropology linguistics... mathematics philosophy humanities art religion

society

probability entropy geometry...

inference logic inductive logic decision th. computer sci. informatics complexity...

life psychology sociobiology

biology: cell, organ, organism, ecology...

physics

??

astronomy, chemistry, earth sci. ...

organic chemistry, evolution...

24

The Big Picture:

ethics

sociology economics anthropology linguistics... mathematics philosophy humanities art religion

society

probability entropy geometry...

inference logic inductive logic decision th. computer sci. informatics complexity...

life psychology sociobiology

biology: cell, organ, organism, ecology...

physics

astronomy, chemistry, earth sci. ...

organic chemistry, evolution...

25

The Big Picture:

inference

society

physics

life

26

Three ingredients: E. Jaynes

E. Nelson

J. Barbour

entropy

diffusion

time

Entropic Dynamics 27

Summary: 1) Hidden variables: no dynamics; just p ( y | x) and S ( x). 2) Changes happen gradually. 3) Entropic time: instants, interval, ordering. 4) The statistical manifold is dynamical: energy conservation.

28

Overview 1) The statistical model: Hidden variables. 2) The dynamical principle: Changes happen gradually. 3) A book-keeping device: Entropic time. 4) Statistical manifold dynamics: Conservative diffusion. 5) Entropic vs. "physical" time.

29

Further reading and references to the literature: go to arxiv.org and search under A.C.

30

The Gravitational Equivalence Principle: We accept the equivalence of gravitational with the "fictitious" forces that arise in accelerated frames because it explains the equality of inertial and gravitational masses and allows a geometrical explanation of gravity.

A Quantum Equivalence Principle? We accept the equivalence of quantum and "epistemic" probabilities because it explains the equality of inertial and osmotic masses it explains linearity, superposition, complex numbers, and allows an inferential explanation of quantum theory. 31

P( x′, y′ | x) S J [ P, Q ] = − ∫ dx′dy′ P ( x′, y′ | x) log Q( x′, y′ | x) Prior:

Q ( x′, y′ | x) ∝ q( x′) × q( y′)

∝ γ 1/ 2 × q( y′) uniform

First constraint:

P ( x′, y′ | x) = P ( x′ | x) P ( y′ | x′, x) = P( x′ | x) p ( y′ | x′)

∈M

∈M

Second constraint: 2 a b 2 Short steps: 〈 ∆ 〉 = 〈γ ab ∆x ∆x 〉 = λ ( x)

32

Step 4: Manifold dynamics? Energy conservation

[Nelson (1979), Smolin (2006)]

[

E = ∫ d 3 x ρ Aγ ab v a v b + Bγ ab u a u b + V ( x)

]

1 1  2 2 E = ∫ d x ρ  m v + µ u + V ( x) 2 2  3

where

2 A τ m= 2 = 2 σ σ mass

2B µ= 2 σ

≈m

osmotic mass 33

But we can always regraduate to a more convenient description.

τ′ τ= , κ

η = κη ′ ,

new units:

New wave function:

φ′ φ= κ

Ψ ′ = ρ 1/ 2 exp iφ '

Schrödinger equation:

η′ 2 η ′  µκ  1 − iη ′ Ψ ′ = − ∇ Ψ ′ + VΨ ′ + 2m 2m  m 2

2

2

 ∇ ( Ψ ′Ψ ′ )  Ψ′ 1 / 2 *  ( Ψ ′Ψ ′ ) 2

34

* 1/ 2