Estimation of radionuclide transport in groundwater at potential ... - WP5

Generalization of the estimated ratio C/C. 0 via interpolation of the modeled data points using: • linear interpolation,. • Kriging and. • the modified Shepard's ...
527KB taille 0 téléchargements 227 vues
Estimation of radionuclide transport in groundwater at potential accelerator sites N. Prolingheuer, B. Schlögl, M. Herbst, B. Heuel-Fabianek, R. Moormann, R. Nabbi

Institut Agrosphäre

im Institut für Chemie und Dynamik der Geosphäre (ICG)

Content Introduction and Motivation Case study Properties of the aquifer Model Calculation basis Modeling I – Different radionuclides Modeling II – Generalization of the estimated activity concentrations Résumé

Introduction and Motivation • Contamination of groundwater as a result of direct radiation is a problem which arises from operating powerful proton-accelerators • License for building and operating such a facility: Verification that the public, the workes and the environment arelprotected from the danger of radioactivity

Objective: Generalizing the method to predict the resultant activity-concentrations at the boundary of the supervised area for every potential location

Case study

Modeling the „worst case“ => highest concentration

Plan view of the model area

Properties of the aquifer Orientated on the hydrological conditions for the region of Jülich Homogeneous soil: • Aquifer thickness: 16 m in z-direction • Bulk density of 2.0 g cm-3 • Hydraulic gradient i: 0.0025 • Hydraulic conductivity Ks: 404.12 m d-1 • Resulting Darcy-velocity vD 5.49 m d-1 (assuming a value of 0.184 for the saturated water content) • Dispersion length

L:

3.64 m

Model • Dimensions: x,y,z: 100 m/700 m/16 m • The model is discretized by a grid of 1.12 mill. cells partitioned in 51 xnodes (mesh size: 2.0 m), 351 y-nodes (2.0 m) and 65 z-nodes (0.75 m) • Dirichlet boundary conditions for the front and the back are imposed to represent the hydraulic gradient. • No-flow boundaries were assigned to the left site, the right site, the bottom and the top. • Length of the simulation period depends on the point of time when steady state conditions are met.

Calculation basis TRACE • Calculates the saturated and unsaturated water flow • Solves numerically the Richards equation on the base of Galerkins’ finite-element-method • Provides the input data files (3-dimensional velocity field and the water content) for the PARTRACE code.

PARTRACE • Particle-tracking code • Includes the random-walk method which calculates the transport of solutes in a given velocity field ( TRACE) • Includes sorption (linear adsorbing, Freundlich and Langmuir isotherm etc.) and decay (zero- and first order decay) • Output: Breakthrough curves for each position in the flow domain and the distribution of the particles.

Modeling I

Kd

Half-life 32P

45Ca

3H

36Cl

14.26 d 5 cm3/g

163 d 5 cm3/g

12.323 a 0 cm3/g

300000 a 0 cm3/g

55Co

35S

60Co

14C

17.54 h 30 cm3/g

87.5 d 14 cm3/g

5.272 a 30 cm3/g

5730 a 7 cm3/g

24Na

57Co

54Mn

32Si

14.96 h 76 cm3/g

271.79 d 30 cm3/g

312.2 d 50 cm3/g

172 a 35 cm3/g

Aim Draw conclusions concerning the migration of radionuclides in groundwater Determination of the accuracy of the generalization

Input rates Nuclide

Half-life ll

lllllllll llkklll (a) 14 41 45 36 55 57 60 3

24 32 35 32 50

mmmmmm 1

)

K d Aquifer Total produced (d aaallllllllllllllllll Saturation Activity -3 3 -1 aa (cm g ) (Bq m ) -

Number of produced Nuclides -3

(m )

C

5730

3,314E-07

7

3,279E-06

8,548E+05

Ca

103000

1,844E-08

5

1,538E-07

7,206E+05

Ca

0,447

4,252E-03

5

1,005E-08

2,042E-01

Cl

300000

6,330E-09

0

1,300E-05

1,774E+08

Co

2,002E-03

9,484E-01

30

9,468E-13

8,625E-08

Co

0,745

2,550E-03

30

3,549E-12

1,202E-04

Co

5,272

3,602E-04

30

2,718E-12

6,521E-04

12,32

1,541E-04

0

3,431E-05

1,923E+04

Mn

0,855

2,220E-03

50

2,405E-12

9,358E-05

Na

1,708E-03

1,112E+00

76

7,081E-08

5,502E-03

P

3,91E-02

4,861E-02

5

5,970E-08

1,061E-01

S

0,240

7,922E-03

14

1,227E-07

1,338E+00

Si

172

1,104E-05

315

1,408E-10

1,102E+00

V

1,400E+17

1,356E-20

327

1,424E-13

9,071E+11

H

54

Decay Rate

Input rates

Geometry of the linac tunnel

Results

4.1 ‘Real’ radionuclides

Committed effective dose

A=

Activity-concentration (Bq/l)

B=

Rate of annual drinking water (L/a)

DCF = Dose conversion factor (Sv/Bq)

Committed effective doses for members of the public resulting from the calculated activity-concentrations for different radionuclides at the boundary of the supervised area (y= 550 m) with the assumption of an annual drinking-water consumption of 240 L a-1.

• Calculations were done on the basis of a simplified model with homogeneous properties and a steady contamination source. • This homogeneity influences also the development of the particleplume in the aquifer.

Vertical distribution (for x= 50 m) of the activity-concentration Cactiv for 3H for a homogeneous model after a steady contamination of 60 days

Modeling II – Generalization • Generalization of the predicted activity-concentrations at the boundary of the supervised area • Method: Connection between the partition coefficient Kd, the half-life T1/2 (as the determining parameters for the migration) and the estimated concentration ratio C/C0 • Usage of ‘synthetic’ radionuclides (86) to include as much radionuclides as possible • Used limits: Kd: 0-1000 cm3 g-1 T1/2: 0.1-1E+07 d)

Spherical regression for generalization

Resulting spherical transfer function:

z(x,y) = resulting concentration-ratio C/C0, x=

partition coefficient Kd (cm3 g-1)

y=

the half-life T1/2 (d)

Interpolation for generalization

Generalization of the estimated ratio C/C0 via interpolation of the modeled data points using: • linear interpolation, • Kriging and • the modified Shepard’s method.

Resulting contour maps for different interpolation methods

Result: • Reduced matrix (basis: data-set of 62,500 interpolated nodes (250 intervals in x- and y-direction)) where the ratio C/C0 at the boundary of the supervised area can be estimated. • Validity: - Kd from 0 to 1000 cm3 g-1 - T1/2 from 10 days to 28,000 years

Résumé • ‘Worst case’ modeling (conservative estimation). • The generalization was done by establishing a connection between the resultant ratio C/C0, the partition coefficient Kd and the half-life T1/2. • Usage of spherical regression and modified Shepard’s interpolation for the generalization. • In comparison with the results for modeled radionuclides the Shepard interpolation is more accurate than the spherical transfer function. • For this simplified model it is now possible to estimate the resultant activity-concentration for nearly each radionuclide at the boundary of the supervised area.

• The combination of a small partition coefficient and a high half-life causes the highest resultant activity-concentrations. • Thus, 3H, 36Cl and 14C are the most significant radionuclides concerning the compliance with the legal limits for radiation. • For higher partition coefficients (Kd > 20 cm3 g-1) in connection with a small half-life (in the range of days or a few years) the probability is high that all nuclides are really decayed before reaching the fence of the supervised area. • By generalizing the migration of radionuclides in groundwater a simplification was achieved proving the compliance of the resultant activity concentrations with the legal limits for radiation at the boundary of the supervised area. • Simple verification if a shielding is effective or not (using different input rates for different shielding)