[2.10] Camillan Roman 400 BC – 275 BC Climat : Agressivité : Zone topographique :

Chaud 1 Arable

Terrains obligatoires : Terrains facultatifs :

(aucun) WW, Rv, H(S), H(G), O, V, RGo, M, Rd, BUA

Avertissements Les troupes irrégulières sont en rouge, les troupes obligatoires en gras, les mots non traduits ou intraduisibles en italique.

Liste principale Désignation Roman C-in-C Roman ally-general Roman sub-general Roman and Italian ally cavalry Roman legions and Latin alae comprised 1/4 each of: • Leves • Hastati • Principes • Triarii Non-Latin Italian infantry Rorarii Accensi Italian Greek allies [Ps (I)] Anti-elephant wagons Incendiary pigs and handlers Ditch and palisade for camp(s)

Type Reg Cv (O) Reg Cv (O) Reg Cv (O) Reg Cv (O) Reg Ps (I) Reg Bd (O) Reg Sp (O) Reg Sp (S) Reg Ax (I) Reg Ps (I) Reg Sp (I) Reg Gal (O) Reg WWg (X) Reg Art (I) TF

Coût 28 18 28 8 1 7 5 7 3 1 4 3 7 4 1

200 pts

250 pts

300 pts

400 pts

1 0-1 0-2 1-3

1-4

2-5

2-6

14-40

18-50

21-60

28-80

0-5 0-6 0-3 0-1 0-3 0-2 0-9

0-6 0-8 0-4 0-1 0-4 0-2 0-11

0-8 0-9 0-5 0-1 0-5 0-2 0-14

0-10 0-12 0-6 0-1 0-6 0-3 0-18

200 pts

250 pts

300 pts

400 pts

Only in 340 BC Désignation Samnite allies

Type Coût List: Samnite (Bk 2)

This list covers Roman armies from the reforms of Camillus until the changes made probably in response to the invasion of Pyrrhos of Epeiros. The infantry now usually fought in three lines, the first of hastati armed with pila, sword and scutum and screened by skirmishing leves, the second of principes with long spear, sword and scutum, and the third of veteran triarii armed as the principes and sometimes supported by the enigmatic rorarii and accensi. Rorarii and accensi had officers and standards, so are classed as regular. Accensi by their name should be servants and were considered less reliable than the rorarii, but on the one occasion they are mentioned in battle were mistaken at a distance for triarii, so must have been armed as spearmen. The rorarii were youngsters and are now usually considered to have provided additional skirmishers. Incendiary pigs and special wagons were a desperate attempt to counter elephants used with little success against Pyrrhos. The wagons were armed with pivoting beams tipped with large blades, spikes or incendiary grapnels and were manned by archers and slingers. Incendiary pigs do not fit the Exp (O) or Ps (X) categories since they are distance weapons, though inaccurate and having a mainly psychological effect. They are instead treated as analogous to hand-launched rockets, except that they cannot affect a target across water. We assume that they are kept tethered by their nose ring until ignited. The useage was of course cruel and inhumane, but blame the Romans, not us. Phil Barker et Richard Bodley Scott, Listes d’armées DBM – Livre 2, 2e édition, novembre 1998

JPM200504

1/1