THE PLIOCENE RAILS OF NORTH AMERICA

Three distal ends of tibiotarsi from the Hagerman local fauna (UMMP. V49618, V51420 ... Canyon local fauna, seem to represent a form of Rallus slightly smaller than the living ..... Foundation for research in Systematic and Evolutionary Biology, NSF GB-6230. .... Late Cenozoic cyprinid fishes from Idaho with notes on other.
600KB taille 1 téléchargements 269 vues
THE

PLIOCENE

RAILS

OF

NORTH

AMERICA

j. ALAN FEDUCCIA

To increaseour understandingof Pliocenelocal faunas of North America, several recent studies of fossil birds have been made from material collectedby Claude W. Hibbard and his field parties from the University of Michigan Museum of Paleontology. Ibises have been reportedby Col-

lins (1964), owlsby Ford (1966) and Ford and Murray (1967), grebes by Murray (1967), a gallinuleby Brodkorb (1967), crane and stork fossils by Feduccia(1967a), and a swallowby Feduccia (1967b). The fossil material has been recoveredmainly from four localities: the Sawrock Canyon, Fox Canyon, and Rexroad local faunas from Kansas, and the Hagerman local fauna from Idaho. Birds reported previously from these localitiesinclude thosestudied by Wetmore (1944) and Tordoff (1951, 1959) from the Rexroadlocal fauna, and by Wetmore (1933) and Brodkorb (1958) from the Hagerman local fauna. The present study was undertaken

to learn more about the rails from these local faunas.

Rallus phillipsi Wetmore from Mohave County, Arizona, and Fulica infelix Brodkorbfrom Malheur County,Oregon,are includedin the systematic list to completethe North American Pliocenerail fauna. During the courseof this study, 46 Recent speciesrepresenting19 genera of rails were examined in the collectionsof the University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, the United States National Museum, and PierceBrodkorb. The specimensexaminedincludedsevenspeciesof Rallus and five speciesof Porzana. The type humerusand someof the referred material of Rallus prenticei were loaned through the kindnessof W. A.

Clemensof the University of Kansas Museum of Natural History and sent to me by Pierce Brodkorb who had them on loan. Severalskins were examinedto gain someidea of size where skeletal material was not available.

The fossilsexamined are in the University of Michigan Museum of Paleontology(UMMP) and the University of KansasMuseum of Natural History (KU). The classificationof rails usedis that of Peters' Check-list (1934). LOCALITIES AND AGE OF FAUNAS

The fossil materials reported herein for the first time come from four localities: 1. The Saw Rock Canyon local fauna is known from the Rexroad formation, Seward County, Kansas, and is taken from a lower part of the section than are either the Rexroad or Fox Canyon local faunas. Evidence favors a late Hemphillian age for the fauna, and many of the mammals are consideredto he directly ancestral to those of the Fox Canyon and Rexroad local faunas (Hibbard, 1964). The Saw Rock Canyon locality is given in Hibbard (1950).

441

The Auk, 85: 441-453. July, 1968

442

J. ALANFEDUCCIA

[Auk, Vol. 85

Figure 1. Left. Bill of largest available male of Railus li•nicola (above). Fossil

bill (UMMP V54981) from the Rexroad local fauna referred to Railus prenticei (below). Actual length of fossilbill, 17.9 mm. Right. Anterior views of tibiotarsi of Recent Rallus sanguinolentus and Rexroad fossil (UMMP V54991) referred to Railus lacustris. Actual length of fossil,39.4 mm.

2. The Fox Canyon local fauna, taken from the Rexroad formation, Meade County, Kansas, was once consideredto be equivalent in age to the Rexroad local

fauna, but is now consideredby Hibbard (1967) to representa slightly older local fauna, which is distinct on the basis of the small mammals. A single bone is reportedberein from the Fox Ca.nyonlocality UM-K1-47 (Hibbard, 1950). 3. The Rexroad local fauna is known from the upper part of the Rexroad formation, Meade County, Ka.nsas.Although the fauna is generally placed in the late Pliocene,Hibbard's latest view is that it representsa slightly older local fauna than the Hagerman. The Rexroad localitiesusedin this paper are given in Hibbard (1950) and Woodburne (1961).

4. The Hagermanlocal fauna has beenrecoveredfrom the GlennsFerry formation (Malde and Powers, 1962), Twin Falls and Owybee counties, Idaho. The fauna has

been variously assignedto both the early Pleistoceneand the late Pliocene, but is currently consideredto be late Pliocenein age (Hibbard et al., 1965), and a potassium-argon date of 3.5 million years b. p. was obtained (Evernden et al., 1964). If this date is accurate,the fauna is definitely in the late Pliocene,but becauseof the large number of collectinglocalities (close to 300) and the thicknessof the beds (about 500 feet), it may be best to refer to the fauna in terms of the North American land mammal age, Blancan. Some of the main Hagerman localitiesare given in Hibbard (1959) and Uyeno (1961).

July, 1968]

North American Pliocene Rails Pzxoc•

443

RAX• FAUNA

Railus prenticei Wetmore

A bill (Figure 1) recoveredfrom the Rexroad local fauna supportsthe view that Rallus prenticeiwas closelyallied to. the living Rallus limicola Vieillot and possiblyancestralto it. The fossilbill differslittle from that

of R. limicola,exceptin beingslightlylarger. Wetmore(1944) described R. prenticeias being slightly larger and stockierthan the living R. limicola; this is confirmedby the additionalspecimens reportedherein. Specimensrecoveredfrom the Hagermanlocal fauna apparentlyalso:represent this species.That most of the Hagerman fossilsare tibiotarsi and coracoidspresentsa problem,as thesetwo elementsfrom somespecimensof R. limicolaare indistinguishable from thoseof certainspecimens of Porzana carolina(Linnaeus)eitherby sizeor osteological characters.Altlmughit is impossible to makea positiveassignment for all the fossilelements,many are definitely assignableto R. prenticei; no specimencould be assigned with certainty to Porzana.

In the present collectionare coracoidsfrom both the Rexroad and Hagermanlocal faunasthat are assignableto R. prenticeion the basisof their closesimilarity to Recent R. limicola. The coracold(KU 3867) that Wetmore (1944) assignedto R. prenticei apparently representsRailus lacustris(Brodkorb), being very closein size to Recent Railus sanguino-

Figure 2. Left. Fossil coracoid fragment (actual length, 13.1 mm) from Hagerman local fauna assignedto Porzana lacustrls by Brodkorb (1958), and coracoid of Recent Rallus sanguinolentus. Right. Coracoids of Recent female (smaller) and male Rallus limlcola.

J. ALAN FEDUCCIA

444

TABLE

[Auk, Vol. 85

1

MEASUREMENTS (IN MILLIMETERS) OF TIBIOTARSIANDHUMERI OF RALLUS

LIMICOLA

AND RALLUS

PRENTICEI

Railus limicola Min. Tibiotarsus

Mean

Railus prenticei• Max.

10

n

Min.

Mean

Max.

4.5

4.8

5.1

4.8

5.1

5.5

7.6 5.3

8.0 5.4

10

Width through

condyles

3.8

4.2

4.6

4.0

4.4

4.9

Depth of internal

condyle Humerus

10

4

Greatest proximal width Greatest Least

distal width

width

of shaft

Total length

6.1 4.5 1.9

6.8 4.7 2.0

7.4 5.1 2.1

7.1 5.1 2.1

2.4

2.6

33.6

35.6

39.2

36.1

39.1

41.0

x Measurements of the type humerus are those in the minimum column. It probably represents a female, the total range of measurementsof R. prenticei being approximately equivalent to those of R. limicola.

lentus (see followingspeciesaccountand Figure 2), and to the coracoid that Broadkorb (1958) assignedto R. lacustris. Measurementsof humeri and tibiotarsi are given in Table 1; coracolds were unmeasurable. Materlal.--Hagerman local fauna: coracoid UMMP

V55326; tibiotarsus UMMP

V48573, V52299, V52413, V52603, V54957, V55327, V55332, V55337; humerusUMMP V48931. Rexroad local fauna: coracoid UMMP V45917; tibiotarsus KU 3870, 3872; humerus KU 3865 (type), 3866, 3872; bill UMMP V54981; tarsometatarsus KU 3869. All KU specimenswere reported by Wetmore (1944).

Rallus lacustris (Brodkorb)

With additional material recoveredfrom the Hagerman local fauna, the rail originally describedas Porzana lacustris Brodkorb (1958) is now placedin the genusRallus. The material now at hand indicatesthat R. lacustriswas very closein both size and osteologyto the Recent South American Rallus sanguinolentusSwainson (=Ortygonax rytirhynchos (Vieillot) of Peters). The distal end of a completehumerus (UMMP

V48930,HagermanUSGS Cenozoic locality19216)is almostidenticalwith the type humerus,whichis onlya distalend. R. lacustrisis almostidentical with the RecentR. sanguinolentus,but the humerusdiffers in having

the shaft decidedlymore robust,distal width smaller,and entepicondylar area lessproduced. The referred tibiotarsi differ from thoseof R. sanguinolentus in having a slightlymorerobustshaft,and in havingthe externalcondylemeeting the shaft at a greater angle. Figure 3 shows the similarity of the tibiotarsi of R. lacustrisand R. sanguinolentus.The referred tarsometatarsiare inseparable fromthoseof R. sanguinolentus.

July, 1968]

North American Pllocene Rails TABLE

445

2

MEASURE/•iENTS(IN MILLIMETERS) OF TIBIOTARSIANDHU2VIERIOF RALLUS SANGUINOLENTUS

AND RALLUS

LACUSTR1S

Rallus sanguinolentus

Rallus

lacustris

Min.

Mean

n

Min.

Mean

Max.

n

7

5.3

5.9

6.5

4

5.6

Max.

Tibiotarsus

Width through condyles Depth of internal condyle

5.8

6.0

7

5.5

6.1

6.7

4

5.7

5.9

6.1

7

2.6

2.9

3.2

3

2.7

2.8

3.0

width Greatest distal width Least width of shaft

7 7 7

8.7 6.2 2.4

9.2 6.6 2.7

10.1 7.2 3.0

2 6 5

8.3 5.6 2.6

5.9 2.8

8.9 6.5 3.0

Total length

7

43.4

45.7

48.5

1

Least width Humerus

of shaft

Greatest proximal

43.4

The coracoidsof R. sanguinolentus, and of most living rails, are too variable to permit definite assignmentof the fossilelements,exceptperhapson the basisof size (seeFigure 2). On that basis,the coracold(KU 3867, Rexroadlocality 2) that Wetmore (1944) assignedto R. prenticei is now tentatively referred to R. lacustris. Wetmore (1944) assigned

anothercoracoid(KU 3868,Rexroadlocality3) to R. prenticei,but I have not examinedthe specimen. R. lacustriswas very closeto the Recent R. sanguinolentusin size and osteological characters,and quite possiblya closeally. Referred Material.--Hagerman local fauna: coracold UMMP V33916 (assigned by Brodkorb, 1958), V48878, V48879, V52289, V52437, V52446, V55084; tibiotarsus UMMP V52435; tarsometatarsusUMMP V45228, V48892, V49585, V52247, V52274, V52275; humerusUMMP V33915 (type), V45282, V4893O, V49537, V49594, V52301. Rexroad local fauna: coracoid KU 3867 (reported by Wetmore, 1944, as R. prenticei) UMMP V54985; tibiotarsusUMMP V54978, V5499O,V54991; tarsometatarsusUMMP V54987, V54988; humerus UMMP V45937.

Rallus phillipsi Wetmore R. phillipsi was describedon the basisof a tarso.metatarsus taken from

the Upper Plioceneof Mohave County,Arizona. Wetmore (1957) diagnosedR. phillipsi as follows: "In someof its charactersRallus phillipsi approachesthe genusPorzana, as representedby the living Porzana carolina (Linnaeus), suggestinga closeraffiliation of this genuswith Rallus throughthe speciesthat lived duringthe latter part of the Tertiary. The bird here described,however,may be placed in Rallus sinceit agreeswith Rallus longirostrisand Rallus limicola and differs from Porzana in the

definitely greater posterior projection of the secondtrochlea and the greater and more open gap between the distal end of this segmentand the base of the third trochlea."

446

J. ALAN FEDUCCIA

[Auk, Vol. 85

Figure 3. Left. Holotype tibiotarsus of Coturni½opsavita, actual length, 8.3 mm. Secondfrom left. Holotype tihiotarsusof Laterallus insignis,actual length, 13.9 min. Right. Ancohal and palmar views of hoiotype humerus (KU 3994) of Gallinula kansarumBrodkorb, actual length, 16.8 min.

Rallus elegans-longirostris group Three distal endsof tibiotarsifrom the Hagermanlocal fauna (UMMP V49618, V51420, V54963) seemto representa rail dose in size and osteology to the living R. elegans-longirastris group. As the separationof the tibiotarsiof the two living formsis very difficult, and perhapsimpossible

in somecasesowing to the overall similarity of charactersand overlap in size,the true affinitiesof thisrail cannot be determined.The possibility alsoexiststhat all three bonesmay not be from the samespecies,but at least two definitelybelongin the elegans-longirostris group. Rallus sp.

The distal fragmentof an ulna (UMMP V55013) and a proximal fragment (UMMP V55014) of the same element, both from the Saw Rock

Canyonlocal fauna, seemto representa form of Rallus slightly smaller than the living Rallus longirostris,and differ from it in severalimportant characters.The two ulnae undoubtedlyrepresenta new species,but the material is too fragmentary to be given a name.

July, 1968]

North American Pliocene Rails TABLE

447

3

MEASIYREMEi•TS (I1• MILI•IMETERS) O•' TIBIOTARSIOF RECEIPT AND FOSSIL ½OTURNICOPS

Width through condyles n

Min.

Mean

Max.

Coturnicops noveboracensis

5

3.2

3.4

3.5

Coturnlcops avita (holotype)

1

2.9

Depth of internal condyle Min.

3.3

Mean

Max.

3.4

3.6

3.0

Coturnicops avita, newspecies (Figure 3)

Holotype.--Distal 8.3 mm of right tibiotarsus(UMMP V52530), collected by Claude W. Hibbard in the summer of 1965. Horizon and locality.--Upper Pliocene,GlennsFerry formation. Hag-

ermanlocal fauna, locality UM-IDA2-65, Hagermanquadrangle,NW •A, sec. 5, T. 8 S., R. 13 E., Twin Falls County, Idaho, elevation3,280•-3,310 feet.

Diagnosis.--The holotype tibiotarsus is generally similar to that of Recent Coturnicopsnoveboracensis (Gmelin), but differs in the following characters:smallerand lessrobust,lessexcavationin tendinalgroove,and bo.thinternal and externalcondylesrelativelysmaller. Table 3 givesthe measurements of the holotypetibiotarsusand of that of C. no.veboracensis. Discussion.--The tibiotarsusof C. novebor•censis is separablefrom the formsof Laterallusthat I examinedby the followingcharacters: internal ligamental prominencelarger and protrudes farther laterally, angle at which shaft meetsinternal co.ndylegreater,and shaft tapersmore rapidly from condyles. Coturnicopsavita is of interest in that it is probably the Plioceneancestorof Recent C. nove'boracensis as indicated by its closenessto the Recent form in size and osteolo.gy. Etymology.--From Latin, avita, ancestral,in reference.to its probable ancestryto C. noveboracensis.

Laterallus insignis, newspecies (Figure 3)

Holotype.--Distal 13.9 mm of right tibiotarsus (UMMP V45423), collectedby Claude W. Hibbard and field party in the summerof 1962. Horizon and locality.--Upper Pliocene, Rexroad formation. Rexroad local fauna, locality UM-K3-53, Wendell Fox Pasture, south side of ShortsCreek,SW •A, SW 2/;,sec.33, T. 33 S., R. 29 W., Meade County, Kansas.

Diagnosis.--Of the speciesof Laterallus examined,the fossil is closest

448

J. ALAN FEDUCCIA TABLE

[Auk, Vol. 85

4

MEASURI•MENTS (IN MILLI.iVIETERS)OF TIBIOTARSIOF LATERALLUS Width through condyles n

Laterallus insignls• Laterallus ]amaicensis

2 3

Laterallus

1

viridis

Laterallus albigularis Laterallus leucopyrrhus

2 4

Min.

Mean

3.5 2.8

l)ep, h of internat condyle

Max.

Min.

3.5 2.9 3.0

3.3 2.8

MeanMax.

3.5 ? 2.9 3.2

3.9

3.7 3.7

3.9 3.8 3.9

Least width of shaft Min.

1.7 1.3

Mean

Max.

1.4 1.5

3.8

2.0

3.6 3.6 3.5 3.6 3.8

1.6 1.9 1.5 1.6 1.7

The first •neasurementin each colmnn is that of the holotype.

to L. leucopyrrhus,but the tibiotarsusdiffers in the followingcharacters: area of tendinal groove more depressed,internal and external condyles relatively smaller, and intercondylardistance relatively less. Measurementsof the holotype tibiotarsusand thoseof other speciesof Laterallus are given in Table 4.

Discussion.--UnlikeLaterallusguti Brodkorb(1952), from the Pleistocene of Florida, Laterallus insignisdoesnot appear to be closely related to Recent Laterallus jamaicensis(Gmdin), being larger and differing in

important characters.Indeed, the Rexroadspeciesappearsto be more closelyallied to the larger Neo.tropicalLaterallus rails, and is described abovein relationto L. leu'copyrrhus, a form it closelyresembles. Referred material.--Distal 12.9 mm o.fleft tibiotarsus,UMMP V54973, from the samelocality as the holotype. The condylesare slightly cracked. Etymology.--From Latin, insignis,remarkable. Gallinula

kansarum

Brodkorb

Sincethe descriptionof Gallinula kansarumBrodkorb (1967), additional elementsof this specieshave been sorted from the Rexroad collections. Theseincludefour fragmentsof humeri,UMMP V29160, V45431, V54972, V54984, and V54966, four coracoids,UMMP V54989, V54968, V45407, and V45408, a carpometacarpus, UMMP V54993, and a tibiotarsus,UMMP V54965. These elementsare assignedto Gallinula kansarumon the basis

of their similarityto the RecentGallinulachloropus(Linnaeus)and their being from the Rexroad local fauna. The type humerusof G. kansarum is shown in Figure 1.

Gallinula sp.

A distal pieceof humerus,UMMP V55330, and a tibiotarsus,UMMP V52604, both from the Hagerman local fauna appear to be from a gallinule almostinseparablefrom certain specimensof the Recent G. chloropus. The tremendousamount on intra- and interspecificvariation amongcoots and gallinulesmakes it impossibleto assign these bones.

July, 1968]

North Anterican Pliocene Rails

449

Fulica infelix Brodkorb This coot was described on the basis of a left tibiotarsus taken from the

Lower Pliocene of Juntufa, Oregon. Fulica in]elix was a small coot similarto the living F. americanaGmelin and the PleistoceneF. shuJeldti Brodkorb (Brodkorb• 1961). INDETERJVtlNABLE MATERIAL

A bill fragment (UMMP V55012) indicates the presenceof a short-billed, Porzanalike rail in the Saw Rock Canyon local fauna. The bill representsa bird larger than the living Porzana carolina and in size approximates the South American rail, Porphyriops melanops. A fragmentary coracoid (UMMP V45750) and an ulna (UMMP V45746) may representthe same species,but its relationshipsto other rails can not be determined.

A single fragment of a humerus (UMMP V29080) from the Fox Canyon local fauna, locality UM-KI-47, differs in many characters from the humeri of all the

living rails that I examinedand probably representsa new genus,but until more material becomesavailable, naming it seemsinadvisable. The collection contains many other rail elements that could not be assignedto any

of the forms coveredhere. A number of ulnae, femora, sterna, and carpometacarpi proved unassignable and are not listed in this paper. PALEOECOLOGY OF THE REXROAD AND HAGERMAN LOCALITIES

Hibbard (1960) summarized his views on Pliocene and Pleistocene climatesof North America basedmainly on fossilcrocodiliansand giant land tortoises. He suggestedthat the presenceof the giant land tortoise, Geochelone rexroadensis Oelrich (1952), with no evidencethat cavesor fissuresexistedfor retreat during the cold weather,indicatedthat a more equable climate existed in Kansas during the Upper Pliocene than at present. Other evidence for too.re equable conditions during the Late

Plioceneof Kansascomesfrom studiesof mollusks(Taylor, 1960), amphibians (Taylor, 1942), and mammals (Hibbard, 1950). Someof the avian fossilsmay also be indicative of a more equable Late Pliocene climate. The presencein the Rexroadlocal fauna of four speciesof ibises, two of possibletropical affinity (Collins, 1964), Agrio.charisprogenes Brodkorb(1964) possiblyallied to the tropicalturkey, Agriocharisocellata (Gould), an unidentified parrot (Wetmore, 1944), and two rails, Rallus lacustrisand Laterallusinsignisof possibletropicalaffinity, along with evidenceoffered by other vertebrateslends support to Hibbard's (1960) view that in the Upper Pliocene,"... a subhumidclimate with winter temperaturesseldom lower than 32ø F existed as far north as southwesternKansas and probably into northern Nebraska." The total

Rexroadlocal fauna indicatesthat marsh,pond,stream,uplandgrassland, meadowflats, and timber comnmnitiesexistedwith more effectivemoisture than at present. The Hagermanlocal fauna,althoughlesswell known than the Rexroad,

450

J. ALAN FEDUCCIA TABLE

[Auk, Vol. 85

5

LIST OFPLIOCENE,PLEISTOCENE• ANDRECENTRAIL FAUNASOF NORTI•IAMERICA Pliocene

Pleistocene

Rallus prenticei Railus lacustris

Rallus phillipsi Railus eleganslongirostris group Railus sp. Coturnicops avita Laterallus insignis Gallinula

Rallus elegans • Rallus longirostris•

Railus elegans Rallus longirostris

Rallus lirnicola •

Rallus limicola C. noveboracensis Porzana carolina

Coturnicops noveboracensis • Porzana carolina •

Porzana auffenbergi Laterallus guti Creccoides osbornii •

kansarum

Gallinula sp. (may not be a faunal addition) Fulica inJelix Saw Rock Canyon Rail indet. Fox Canyon Rail indet.

Recent

Aramides cajanea• Porpyrula rnartinica• Gallinula chloropus• Gallinula

L. jarnaicensis Gallinula chloropus Porphyrula martinica Fulica americana

brodkorbi

Fulica shufeldti Fulica

hesterna

Fulica arnericana •' Neospecies

Describedfrom the Blancoformation (Texas), which was originally thought to be Pliocene.

doesnot showthe large numberof warm faunal elementspresentin the latter. The morenorthernlocation,plus the possibilityof a youngerage for the fauna may accountfor the difference.The large fish fauna, the presenceof threeor four speciesof cormorants,five speciesof rails (only three are known in Idaho today, Arvey, 1947), a stork and a crane,and many ducks,geese,and swans,all point to the presenceof extensivelowland marshwith probablymore moisturethan today. DISCUSSION

A minimumof 12 speciesof rails existedduring the Plioceneof North America; sevenare now named. One coot, Fulica infelix, is known from the Early Plioceneof Oregon,and two other rails, a probablemembero.f the genusRallus, and a Porzana-like rail are known from the Late Hemp-

hillJanSawRock Canyonlocalfaunaof Kansas.The remainderare known from Late Plioceneor Early Blancandepositsof Kansas (Rallus prenticei, R. lacustris,Laterallusinsignis,and Gallinula kansarum ) , Idaho ( Rallus prenticei,R. lacustris,R. elegans-lo'ngirostris group,Coturnicopsavita, and Gallinula sp.), and Arizona (Rallus phillipsi). Table 5 summarizesthe rail faunas of the Pliocene, Pleistocene,and Recent of North

America.

The Recent rail fauna of North

America is

smallerthan thoseof either the Plioceneor Pleistocene,especiallyconsidering that all the rails of the Plioceneand Pleistoceneare almostcertainly not known. That no Recent speciesare recordedwith certainty from the Plioceneseemsto indicate that most of the Recent speciesevolved during the Plioceneor Early Pleistocene.

July, 1968]

North American Pliocene Rails

451

The Pleistocenerail fauna is of interest for several reasons. The large

numberof speciespresentindicatesthat the rail fauna has dwindled in fairly recenttimes,perhapscoincidentallywith the great extinctionsthat occurredduring the Pleistoceneof North America,especiallyduring the Wisconsinice age when many mammaliangenerabecameextinct. One rail, Aramidescajanea,becamerestrictedto.the presentday tropics,while othersapparentlygaverise to new speciesor were unableto withstandthe ensuing cold and died out. Most of the modernrail fauna probably originated during the Pliocene

and Early Pleistocene.While many of the Plioceneformscannotbe considered to be ancestralto modern forms, some, such as Rallus prenticci and Coturnicopsavita do appear to be probable ancestorsof modern species.All of the modernspeciesare known from the Pleistocene,with the exceptionof Laterallus jamaicensis. So except for Laterallus guti, which could have been ancestralto Recent Laterallus jamaicensis,the remainderof the rails, PorzanaauffenbergiBrodkorb,Creccoidesosbornii

Shufeldt, Gallinula brodkorbiMcCoy, Fulica shufeldti Brodkorb, and Fulica hesternaHoward, all appear to have becomeextinct during the Pleistocene.

Brodkorb (1958) pointed out that the trend toward small size in the Hagermanavifaunaas exemplifiedby Pelecanushalieus,Cygnushibbardi, and Chen pressa,might be interpretedas a reflectionof the warm climate of a preglacialor interglacial stage. One of the rails, Coturnicopsavita, showsthis trend, while Rallus prenticeiis larger than its Recent counterpart, Railus limicola,the speciesto which it is possiblyancestral. One of the grebesreportedby Murray (1967), Aechmophorus elassonMurray, a possible ancestor of Recent Aechmophorusoccidentalis (Lawrence) is smallerthan its Recentcounterpart,while PodilymbusmajusculusMurray is larger than Podilymbuspodiceps(Linnaeus), the form to which it is possiblyancestral. No trend can thereforebe stated unequivocally. Ac KNOWLEDG•VIENTS

I would like to expressappreciation to R. L. Zusi and A. Wetmore who made the skeletal collections of the United States National Museum available to me, and to Pierce Brodkorb for permitting me to study his collection, for his criticism of a draft of this paper, and for providing photographs of Gallinula kansarum prepared by Robert W. McFarlane. I would also like to thank R. W. Storer, B. G. Murray, Jr., and H. B. Tordoff for their criticism of the manuscript, Karola Kutasi for photographing all the specimensexcept G. kansarum, and specially C. W. Hibbard for placing the fossil rails at my disposal and for supervision and encouragement

throughout this study. Hibbard's field work in Idaho was supported by National Science Foundation Grants G-19458 and GB-1528. This study was supported in part by a grant to the University of Michigan from the National ScienceFoundation for research in Systematic and Evolutionary Biology, NSF GB-6230.

452

J. ALA• FEDUCCIA LITERATURE

[Auk, Vol. 85

CITED

ARVEY, M. D. 1947. A check-list of the birds of Idaho. Univ. Kansas Publ. Mus. Nat. Hist., 1: 193-216. BRODKORB• P. 1952. A new rail from the Pleistoceneof Florida. Wilson Bull., 64: 80-82.

1958. Fossil birds from Idaho. Wilso.n Bull., 70: 237-242. 1961. Birds from the Plioceneof Juntufa, Oregon. Quart. J. Florida Acad. Sci., 24: 169-184. BRODY:ORB, P. 1964. Notes on fossil turkeys. Quart. J. Florida Acad. Sci., 27: BRODKORB• P. BRODKORB,P.

223-229.

BRODY:ORB, P. 1967. Catalogueof fossil birds: part 3 (Ralliformes, Ichthyornithiformes, Charadriiformes). Bull. Florida State Mus., 11: 99-220. Coffins, C.T. 1964. Fossil ibises from the Rexroad fauna of the Upper Pliocene of Kansas. Wilson Bull., 76: 43-49.

EVER•rDE•,J. F., D. E. SAVAGE, G. H. CURTIS,ANDG. T. JAMES. 1964. Potassiumargon dates and the Cenozoicmammalian chronologyof North America. Amer. J. Sci., 262: 145-198. FEDUCCIA,J. A. 1967a. Ciconia maltha and Grus americana from the Upper Pliocene of Idaho. Wilson Bull., 79: 316-321. FEDUCCIA,J. A. 1967b. A new swallow from the Fox Canyon local fauna (Upper Pliocene) of Kansas. Condor, 69: 526. FORD,N. L. 1966. Fossil owls from the Rexroad fauna of the Upper Pliocene of Kansas. Condor, 68: 472-475. FORD,N. L., AND B. G. MURRAY, JR. 1967. Fossil owls from the Hagerman local fauna (Upper Pliocene) of Idaho. Auk, 84: 115-117. HIBBARD,C. W. 1950. Mammals of the Rexroad formation from Fox Canyon, Meade County, Kansas. Contrib. Mus. Paleontol.,Univ. Michigan, 8: 113-192.

HIBBARD, C. •r. 1959. Late Cenozoicmicrotinerodentsfrom Wyomingand Idaho. Pap. Michigan Acad. Sci., Arts, and Letters, 44: 3-40. HIBBARD, C. W. 1960. An interpretationof Plioceneand Pleistoceneclimatesin North America. 62nd Ann. Rept. Mich. Acad. Sci., Arts, and Letters, 45: 5-36. HIBBARD,C. W. 1964. A contribution to the Saw Rock Canyon local fauna of Kansas. Pap. Michigan Acad. Sci., Arts, and Letters, 49: 115-127. HIBBARD, C.W. 1967. New rodentsfrom the late Cenozoicof Kansas.Pap. Michigan Acad. Sci., Arts, and Letters, 52(1966): 115-131. HIBB^RD,C. W., D. E. RAY, D. E. SAVAGE, D. W. TAYLOR. ANDJ. E. GUILDAY. 1965. Quaternarymammalsof North America. Pp. 509-525 in The Quarternaryof the United States (H. E. Wright, Jr. and D. G. Frey, eds.). Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton

Univ.

Press.

MALDE,]-I. E., A37DH. a. POWERS.1962. Upper Cenozoicstratigraphyof Western SnakeRiver Plain, Idaho. Geol. Soc.Amer. Bull., 73: 1197-1220. MURRAY,B. G., JR. 1967. Grebesfrom the late Plioceneof North America. Condor, 69:

277-288.

OELR•C•q, T. M.

1952. A new Testudo from the Upper Pliocene of Kansas with

additional notes on associated Rexroad mammals. Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci., 55:300-311.

PETERS,J. L.

1934. Check-list of birds of the world, vol. 2. Cambridge,Massa-

chusetts,Harvard Univ. Press. TAYLOR,D.W. 1960. Late Cenozoicmolluscanfaunas from the High Plains. U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 337: 1-86.

July, 1968]

North American Pliocene Rails

453

T^YLOR, E.H. 1942. Extinct toads and frogs from the Upper Pliocene deposits of Meade County, Ka.nsas. Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 28.' 199-235. ToRuoFr, H. B. 1951. Osteology of Colinus hibbardl, a Pliocene quail. Condor, $3:

23-30.

To•uoFF, H. B.

1959. A condor from the Upper Pliocene of Kansas. Condor, 61:

338-343.

UYE•ro, T. 1961. Late Cenozoic cyprinid fishes from Idaho with notes on other fossil minnows in North America. Pap. Michigan Acad. Sci., Arts, and Letters, 46:329

WErMO•,

344.

A.

1933. Pliocene bird remains from Idaho.

Smiths. Misc. Coll., 8?:

1-12.

W•rMo•, A. 1944. Remains of birds from the Rexroad fauna of the Upper Plioceneof Kansas. Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull., 30.' 89-105. W•T•fO•E, A. 1957. A fossil rail from the Pliocene of Arizona. Condor, 59'- 267268.

WOO•)BURNE, M. O. 1961. Upper Pliocene geology and vertebrate paleontology of part of the Meade Basin, Kansas. Pap. Michigan Acad. Sci., Arts, and Letters, 4,6: 61-101.

The Universityo] MichiganMuseumof Zoology,Ann Arbor,Michigan 48104.