Team Design Process for a 6x6 All-Road Wheelchair

www.bostondynamics.com. ○ Leg. ○ Wheel. ○ Hybrid ... Natural gait / self-teaching. ✓ Legs with feet = wheels ... Nomad. Dual Ackermann steering strategy.
4MB taille 4 téléchargements 269 vues
Experimental Validation of Stable Obstacle Climbing with a Four-Wheel Mobile Robot OpenWHEEL i3R 4W Stable Climbing [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Clermont-Ferrand, France

LaMI

UBP

IFMA

TIMS

Mechanical Engineering Research Group

Blaise Pascal University

French Institute for Advanced Mechanics

Research Federation

Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

1

Introduction More agile mobile robots needed in the future 4W Stable Climbing

Spatial exploration Mars exploration robot A rover for sample analysis www.nasa.gov/centers/jpl

Introduction Agile robots Locomotion

Challenging usual applications

Exp. settings Experiment Conclusion

Wheeled ATVs are blocked on ground discontinuities Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

Wheelchair blocked before an obstacle

MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

2

Introduction One big machine ✔

4W Stable Climbing

Agriculture

A fleet of agile robots ✔

Rescue

Fleet of robots to avoid soil compaction

Introduction Agile robots Locomotion

Earthquake Mag. 7.4 Turkey (1999) Scanning the streets and buildings

Exp. settings Experiment



Beach cleaning uses big machines or manual cleaning

Conclusion

Beach pollution Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

Towed filtering machine

Manual cleaning

MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

3

Introduction This work is about: ✔

4W Stable Climbing Introduction Agile robots Locomotion Exp. settings Experiment Conclusion

✔ ✔ ✔

Wheeled robots That climb step obstacles With only four wheels And stable behaviour

Within the OpenWHEEL framework Wireless connection A3 Rear

S 32

Control

S 31 Wheel W31

A2

I2

S 21

W21

Double wishbone

W22

Innovative suspension

S 11

W11

S 12

A1 Control

I1

W12

Camera

S22

Control

Suspension mechanism Saw Swing arm

Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

CAN Bus

W 32

n Fro

t Z X Y

Inter-axle mechanism Ia Serial Parallel Innovative mechanism mechanism mechanism

MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

4

Agile mobile robots Terrestrial locomotion system ✔ ✔

4W Stable Climbing



- unilateral / bilateral - slipping / sticking - can change in nature and number

Terrestrial vehicles & robots ✔

Introduction

Poly-articulated mechanical system Interact with environment Contacts with the ground

✔ ✔

Wheeled vehicles prevail (energetic efficiency ?) Blocked on slope discontinuities of the ground Legs / Tracks regain interest for climbing

Agile robots

Interface with the ground

Locomotion



Crawler

+ multiples contacts, can cross obstacles & rough terrain - require high energy, moderate speed, complex control

Experiment



Leg

+ can cross obstacles and go fast on rough terrain - contact discontinuity, energy cost, stability control

Conclusion



Wheel

+ fast on smooth surface, energy efficient - cannot climb obstacles or run on rough terrain



Track

+ permanent stability, high traction - high friction energy loss, particularly during steering

Exp. settings

Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

5

Mobile robots based on legs ✔ ✔ ✔

Bi / Quadri / Hexa / Octo Natural gait / self-teaching Legs with feet = wheels

4W Stable Climbing Yanboo III (13kg,0.7m high) Biped with suction/rolling effectors Legs are manipulators www-robot.mes.titech.ac.jp

Introduction Agile robots ●

Leg



Wheel



Hybrid

Locomotion Exp. settings Experiment Conclusion

Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

Big Dog (75kg, 1m long, 6km/h, 35° slopes, 150kg payload) www.bostondynamics.com

Roller-Walker (24kg, 0.5m long) Convertible wheels / Dual locomotion mode: walking / roller-skating www-robot.mes.titech.ac.jp

MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

6

Wheeled robots ✔ ✔

Wheel: energy efficient even when steering Only exception : skid steering

4W Stable Climbing Introduction Agile robots ●

Leg



Wheel



Hybrid

Locomotion Exp. settings Experiment Conclusion

Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

Pioneer P3-AT Skid steering simple robot www.mobilerobots.com

Nomad Dual Ackermann steering strategy www.frc.ri.cmu.edu/projects/lorax

MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

7

Adaptative Wheeled Robots ✔ ✔

Minimally actuated frame, energy efficiency Simple control

4W Stable Climbing Introduction Agile robots ●

Leg



Wheel



Hybrid

Locomotion

Micro5 Climbing abilities via 5 wheels www.mit.edu/~ykuroda

Rocky 7 Adaptative rocker-bogie structure www-robotics.jpl.nasa.gov

Exp. settings Experiment Conclusion

Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

8

Adaptative Wheeled Robots Crab I Adaptative parallel bogies Obstacle climbing abilities www.asl.ethz.ch

4W Stable Climbing Introduction Agile robots ●

Leg



Wheel



Hybrid

Shrimp 6 wheels on 2 // bogies and 1 front linkage www.asl.ethz.ch

Locomotion Exp. settings Experiment Conclusion

Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

9

Hybrid multi-mode robots ✔ ✔

4W Stable Climbing

Highly actuated frame Orientable tracks for special modes of displacement

Introduction Agile robots ●

Leg



Wheel



Hybrid

Locomotion Exp. settings Experiment

Azimut 4 orientable tracks www.gel.usherbrooke.ca/laborius

Conclusion

Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

Helios VII 2 articulated tracks + 1 manipulating arm with hybrid grip/wheel end effector www-robot.mes.titech.ac.jp

MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

10

Hybrid multi-mode robots ✔ ✔

4W Stable Climbing Introduction Agile robots ●

Leg



Wheel



Hybrid

Highly actuated frame Displacement modes: peristaltic crossing, obstacle climbing

RobuROC 6 (150 kg, 1.5m long) 3 tiltable axles with passive warping Able to turn on itself Can climb obstacles www.robosoft.fr

Locomotion Exp. settings

Hylos (0.5m long) 4 wheels on 3DOF legs www.robot.jussieu.fr Lama Peristaltic crossing of sandy areas www.laas.fr

Experiment Conclusion

Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

11

Chosen locomotion modes for OpenWHEEL Chosen architecture 4W Stable Climbing Introduction Agile robots Locomotion

✔ ✔

✔ ✔

OpenWHEEL



OW i3R





Stability



Experiment Conclusion Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

Rolling Climbing step obstacles

Multi-modes

Only four wheels ✔

Climbing

Exp. settings

Hybrid robot

Two locomotion modes (at least)





Wheels (efficiency) On legs (climbing ability)

No existing robot that climb with only four wheels A challenge for stability during climbing Easier to transfer on real vehicles

Few actuators ✔ ✔

Actuated wheels Few actuators in legs/frame for better simplicity / stiffness / consumption / price MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

12

OpenWHEEL i3R i3R = 3R inter-axle mechanism ✔ ✔

4W Stable Climbing Introduction

2 passive R joints in the middle of the axles 1 actuated R joint for central warping

Kinematic structure with double symmetry OpenWHEEL i3R A big central actuator for warping

Passive joint Axle steering without robot motion

Agile robots Locomotion ●

OpenWHEEL



OW i3R



Stability



Climbing

ar e R

Exp. settings Experiment Conclusion Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

W21

W22

nt o r F

W11

W12 Four actuated wheels More space for payload

MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

13

Stability criterion on 3 wheels 2D modelling when lifting one wheel

Introduction Agile robots

Wheel W12 (front-left)

Wheel W21 (rear-right)

1)

2)

3)

Front axle steering

4W Stable Climbing

Wheel W11 (front-right)

W12

4)

W11 G

G

G



OW i3R



Stability



Climbing

5)

Rear axle steering

OpenWHEEL

W22

G

W21

Locomotion ●

Wheel W22 (rear-left)

W11

G

6)

W12

7)

G

8)

G

G W21

W22

Exp. settings Experiment Conclusion Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

Stable

Unstable

Stable

Unstable

Stability if the lifted wheel is inside the turn MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

14

Stability during climbing 3D modelling Stability margin on 3 wheels when climbing = HG' 4W Stable Climbing Introduction

W12

Exploring wheel

Agile robots

Obstacle

G1

Locomotion ●

R0 W11

OpenWHEEL



OW i3R



Stability



Climbing

Exp. settings

R1

G W22 R2 P21

P12

H G'

G2 W21

Experiment Conclusion Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

P22 MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

15

Climbing process Climbing sequence in 7 phases / 19 stages 1

4W Stable Climbing

A - Prepairing W22

Low

Introduction

2

W12

B - W 11 climbing

3

4

5

C - W 12 climbing

7

8

9

E - W 21 climbing

12

13

14

17

18

19

High

W21

W11

6

Agile robots Locomotion ●

OpenWHEEL



OW i3R



Stability



Climbing

Exp. settings

10

D – Going forward

15

F - W 22 climbing

11

16

G - Conclusion

Experiment Conclusion Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

16

Climbing process Strong simplifying hypotheses ✔

4W Stable Climbing Introduction

✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Agile robots

Negligible mass of the inter-axle mechanism Non-deformable bodies (i.e. infinite part stiffness) Small warping rotation-angles to avoid representation of complex 3D poses Punctual ground-wheel contact with toric wheels Perfect rolling without slipping assuming that normal forces are sufficient to ensure enough traction

Locomotion ●

OpenWHEEL



OW i3R



Stability



Climbing

Incremental validation ✔ ✔ ✔

Multi-body Adams model [IROS 06] Reduced model [MTM 2008] Full scale model [in process...]

Exp. settings Experiment Conclusion Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

17

Wheel sub-assembly Four identical wheel sub-assemblies ✔

4W Stable Climbing

✔ ✔ ✔

One 9V actuator : 200 rpm, 3.52 N.cm on top of the wheel Transmission ratio 1/15 Rubber air-tire with good friction (Diam 49.6 mm) Overconstrained structure - mass 149 g

Introduction

2

Agile robots Locomotion

Z40

Z8

3

C

Exp. settings ●

Wheel



Inter-axle



Whole robot



E 0 Z8

Software

Experiment

Z24

1

Conclusion Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

18

Inter-axle mechanism High torque warping mechanism ✔

4W Stable Climbing Introduction

✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

The same 9V actuator as for the wheels Transmission ratio 1/560 Double worm gear redundant overconstrained transmission Minimized backlash Improved tooth strength

Agile robots

Z16

Locomotion Exp. settings ●

Wheel



Inter-axle



Whole robot



F1

Z16

Z8 E

F2 Z8

Software

Z56

Experiment

Z40 Conclusion Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

19

Whole reduced model of the robot Whole assembly = 2 axles + 1 inter-axle mechanism 4W Stable Climbing



Total weight 1430 g



Center of mass quasicentered

Introduction

 G1 G=0.497 G1 G2

Agile robots Locomotion





Wheel



Inter-axle





Whole robot Software

Experiment



Translation speed 55mm/s



Warping speed 45° in 21s (with oil)

170 mm

Exp. settings

G1

Carries its power (12 AA batteries)

G G2

W12 17 5  m

m

W22

m 0  9 1

m

Conclusion Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

20

Software architecture Embedded program in each control unit NQC language, BricxCC developing environment 4W Stable Climbing



Introduction



✔ ✔

Control unit 1 for axle 1 (Master) Control unit 2 for axle 2 and warping joint R0 (Slave) Exchanges between units via infrared port Protocol by message sending and detection loop

Agile robots Locomotion Exp. settings ●

Wheel



Inter-axle



Whole robot



Master program for A1

Slave program for A2+ R0

// Stage 2 : rev W22 / fwd W21 Bip(); SendMessage (2); ClearMessage(); until (Message() == 2);

  // Stage 2 : rev W22 / fwd W21   if (Message() == 2)     {     OnRev (W22);     OnFwd (W21);     Wait(150);     Off (W22+W21);     SendMessage(2);     }

Software

Experiment Conclusion Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

21

Experimental climbing Purpose: validating the climbing strategy ✔

4W Stable Climbing

✔ ✔

Obstacle: 55 mm high Higher than a wheel Actuators at full speed with open loop control Useful to determine the most suitable sensors

Introduction Agile robots Locomotion Exp. settings Experiment ●

Climbing



Adjustments



Control



Improvement

Conclusion Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

Difficulties ✔ ✔

Initial tests with stabilized power – Final test with batteries Difficult to debug: the final pose depends on the full process MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

22

Phase A – Stage 01

4W Stable Climbing Introduction Agile robots Locomotion Exp. settings Experiment ●

Climbing



Adjustments



Control



Improvement

Conclusion Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

23

Phase B – Stage 02

4W Stable Climbing Introduction Agile robots Locomotion Exp. settings Experiment ●

Climbing



Adjustments



Control



Improvement

Conclusion Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

24

Phase B – Stage 03

4W Stable Climbing Introduction Agile robots Locomotion Exp. settings Experiment ●

Climbing



Adjustments



Control



Optional: going against the obstacle and actuating the wheel for bonus tangential force

Improvement

Conclusion Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

25

Phase B – Stage 04

4W Stable Climbing Introduction Agile robots Locomotion Exp. settings Experiment ●

Climbing



Adjustments



Control



Improvement

Conclusion Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

26

Phase B – Stage 05

4W Stable Climbing Introduction Agile robots Locomotion Exp. settings Experiment ●

Climbing



Adjustments



Control



Optional: the exploring wheel can land faster if it was lifted just at the level of the obstacle

Improvement

Conclusion Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

27

Phase C – Stage 06

4W Stable Climbing Introduction Agile robots Locomotion Exp. settings Experiment ●

Climbing



Adjustments



Control



With pitch angle and contact on four wheels, steering Axle A1 is coupled with warping the frame

Improvement

Conclusion Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

28

Phase C – Stage 07

4W Stable Climbing Introduction Agile robots Locomotion Exp. settings Experiment ●

Climbing



Adjustments



Control

W11 serves as a pivot for Axle A1 Slipping risk on W11

Improvement Solution: unsteer slightly Axle A2 Slightly lifts W12 Conclusion Increase normal force on W11 ●

Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

29

Phase C – Stage 08

4W Stable Climbing Introduction Agile robots Locomotion Exp. settings Experiment ●

Climbing



Adjustments



Control



Improvement

Conclusion Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

30

Phase C – Stage 09

4W Stable Climbing Introduction Agile robots Locomotion Exp. settings Experiment ●

Climbing



Adjustments



Control



Improvement

Conclusion Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

31

Phase D – Stage 10

4W Stable W and W with same speed set point Normal forces differ Climbing 11

12

Induced steering on axle A1

Introduction Agile robots Locomotion

Exp. settings Experiment ●

Climbing



Adjustments



Control

Improvement Solution: closed-loop control - to equilibrate normal forces Conclusion - to keep a constant steering angle ●

Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

32

Phase E – Stage 11

4W Stable Climbing Introduction Agile robots Locomotion Exp. settings Experiment ●

Climbing



Adjustments



Control



Improvement

Conclusion Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

33

Phase E – Stage 12

4W Stable Climbing Introduction Agile robots

Solution: additional 149 g counterweight

Locomotion Exp. settings Experiment Risk ●ofClimbing instability during W21 climbing ● Adjustments ●



Control Improvement

Conclusion Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

34

Phase E – Stage 13

4W Stable Climbing Introduction Agile robots Locomotion Exp. settings Experiment ●

Climbing



Adjustments



Control



Improvement

Conclusion Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

35

Phase E – Stage 14

4W Stable Climbing Introduction Agile robots Locomotion Exp. settings Experiment Climbing Optional: the exploring wheel can land faster if it was lifted just at the ● Adjustments level of the obstacle







Control Improvement

Conclusion Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

36

Phase F – Stage 15

4W Stable Climbing Introduction Agile robots Locomotion Exp. settings Experiment ●







Climbing Optional: going against the Adjustments obstacle and actuating the wheel for bonus tangential force Control Improvement

Conclusion Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

37

Phase F – Stage 16

4W Stable Climbing Introduction Riskrobots of instability Agile

during W22 climbing

Locomotion

Solution: additional 149 g counterweight

Exp. settings Experiment ●

Climbing



Adjustments



Control



Improvement

Conclusion Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

38

Phase F – Stage 17

4W Stable Climbing Introduction Agile robots Locomotion Exp. settings Experiment ●

Climbing



Adjustments



Control



Improvement

Conclusion Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

39

Phase F – Stage 18

4W Stable Climbing Introduction Agile robots Locomotion Exp. settings Experiment ●

Climbing



Adjustments



Control



Improvement

Conclusion Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

40

Phase G – Stage 19

4W Stable Climbing Introduction Agile robots Locomotion Exp. settings Experiment ●

Climbing



Adjustments





Control

Risk of lateral drift with respect to phase 1

Improvement

Conclusion Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

41

Design adjustments Axle A1 climbs more easily than Axle A2 4W Stable Climbing Introduction

Need for a counterweight ✔

The counterweight breaks longitudinal symmetry



Possible explanation: if the centre of mass G is too high, its projection on the ground G' moves relatively to contact points Pi and stability criterion is no more respected

Agile robots Locomotion

G2

G

G1

Exp. settings

G

G2

Experiment ●

Climbing



Adjustments



Control



Improvement

G1

P1 P2



G'

P1

P2

G'

The 149 g counterweight brings G forward of 16 mm  G1 G=m2 /m1m2  G 1 G2=0.408 G1 G2

Conclusion Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

42

Control Control laws for the 4 wheels and central actuator ✔ ✔

4W Stable Climbing Introduction

Phases B-D-E-F are similar in length Warping phases take 80% of time. Warping angle < 26°

700

Phase E

Angles of rotation of the actuators of OW i3R 600

Angle Angle Angle Angle Angle

500

Phase F

W12 (°) W11 (°) W22 (°) W21 (°) R0 (°)

Agile robots 400

Phase B

Locomotion

Phase C

300

Exp. settings 200

Experiment 100 ●

Climbing



Adjustments



Control



Improvement

0

-100

2 3

45

6

7

8

9

10 11

12

13 14

15

16

17 18

19

-200 0

Conclusion Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

89 s MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

43

Control improvement The good metrics for measuring climbing ability 4W Stable Climbing Introduction Agile robots Locomotion

✔ ✔ ✔

Better control to improve climbing Adding sensors for precise monitoring ✔ ✔

Exp. settings Experiment ●

Climbing



Adjustments



Control



Not the wheel diameter Comparison Obstacle height / Altitude of the centre of mass OpenWHEEL i3R can climb obstacles as high as 67% ZG



Angular coders on actuators (wheels + warping central joint) Coders on passive joints (axle steering) Ultra-sound sensor to detect obstacle / measure height

Rolling without slipping ✔ ✔

Measuring normal force Pitch → Two-axes force gauges in the rim of the wheels

Improvement

Conclusion Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

44

Conclusion Results 4W Stable Climbing Introduction



A new principle for stable obstacle climbing



Usable with only 4 wheels for simplicity



Only one supplemental central actuator



A climbing process in 19 stages



Validated on a reduced model of OpenWHEEL i3R



Climbs obstacles as high as 66% of ZCentre of mass

Agile robots Locomotion Exp. settings Experiment Conclusion

In the future ✔

Geometrical model for coupled actuation of steering / warping



Obstacle detection and control adaptation



Normal force / slipping regulation



Optimizing kinematics & structure



Optimizing climbing strategy: how much can we climb with 4 wheels ?

Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

45

02

03

4W Stable Climbing 04

Introduction Agile robots Locomotion

05

Next step ?

Exp. settings Experiment Conclusion

06

A stable climbing process Multibody validation (Adams) Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

Experimental validation on actuated reduced model

MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

46

Conclusion

4W Stable Climbing Introduction Agile robots Locomotion Exp. settings Experiment Conclusion Full scale demonstrator 140 kg, 1.4m long

Fauroux / Bouzgarrou / Chapelle LaMI, Clermont-Ferrand, France

MTM2008 - 10th International Conference on Mechanisms and Mechanical Transmissions 8-10 October 2008, Polytechnichal University of Timisoara, Romania

47