Stress Testing Following P. Jorion, Value at Risk, McGraw ... - Yats.com

Financial Risk Management. Stress Testing. Following P. Jorion, Value at Risk, McGraw-Hill. Chapter 10. Daniel HERLEMONT. Need for Stress Testing.
367KB taille 2 téléchargements 236 vues
Financial Risk Management

Stress Testing Following P. Jorion, Value at Risk, McGraw-Hill Chapter 10

Daniel HERLEMONT

Need for Stress Testing  VAR measures based on recent history can fail to identify extreme unusual situation that could cause severe loss  Stress Testing

 Stress Testing is required by the Basle Committee as well as recommended by the G-30 Derivatives Policy Group.

 However the definition of Stress Testing is still vague ...

Daniel HERLEMONT

Page 1 1

 Stress Testing can be defined as the process to identify and manage that could cause extraordinary losses  Tools  Scenario Analysis  Stressing Models  Policy Responses

 Compared to VAR, Stress Testing appears simple and intuitive Daniel HERLEMONT

Contents  Why Stress Testing is required increasing confidence level may not be sufficient ...

 How to use scenarios to generate portfolios losses  Scenarios analysis  Stress models  Management actions Daniel HERLEMONT

Page 2 2

Why Stress Testing ? - the 1987 crash The October 87 crash is a -20 sigma event ... Even if there are some time variation in volatility models, 20 sigma event are so far away that it should have never happen under normal model The 99% VAR would have totally missed the magnitude of actual loss Such event can be modeled through the use of Extreme Value Theory (EVT) Daniel HERLEMONT

Goal of Stress Testing  Identify scenarios that would not occur under standard VAR models  Simulating shocks that have never occurred (peso problem) or are more likely to occur that historical data suggest  Simulating shocks that reflect permanent structural breaks or temporally changed statisticals patterns

Daniel HERLEMONT

Page 3 3

Implementing Scenario Analysis  Define and select a scenario s  obtained by a set of changes in risk factors  All the securities are then re-evaluated using a full evaluation method  similar to historical simulation, except that we don't generate all the distribution, and scenario receive equal small probabilities Daniel HERLEMONT

Generating Unidimentional Scenarios  Traditional approach focuses on one variable at a time.  For example, the G-30 Group recommend focusing on a set of specific movements:  Parallel yield curve shifting by +/- 100 basis points  Yield curve twisting by +/- 25 basis points  Each of the 4 combinaisons of yield curve shifting and twisting  Implied volatility change by +/- 20%  Equity index value change by +/- 10%  Currencies moving by +/- 6%  Swap spread changing by +/- 20 basis points

 Appropriate when portfolios depend primaraly on one source of risk

Daniel HERLEMONT

Page 4 4

Example - the SPAN system

 Standard Portfolio Analysis of Risk (SPAN) set up by the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) to determine collateral requirements, widely used by futures and options exchange to define margin requirements

 SPAN is to determine portfolios values under a series of scenario. Then SPAN searches the largest loss and set the margin requirements at that level. Daniel HERLEMONT

SPAN Example

Manageable since SPAN consider only 2 factors Daniel HERLEMONT

Page 5 5

Multi-Dimentional Scenarios Analysis  Mono-dimentional provides an intuitive understanding of the effects of movements in key variables, using a bottom up approah Problems: do not account for correlations

 Multi-dimentional Defining a state of the world Inferring movements in markets variable This is a top-down approach

 Perspective Scenarios  Factor Push Method Daniel HERLEMONT

Conditional Scenario Method  Systematic method to incorporate correlations across all variables consistently  R* = extreme returns of key variables under extreme movements  Perform conditional regressions

 We can then construct predicted stress loss as

Daniel HERLEMONT

Page 6 6

Conditional Scenario Method- Example

Conditional Model provides better estimate of actual loss than Narrow (naive) model

Daniel HERLEMONT

Historical Simulation

To some extent, extreme correlations can be inferred from historical events drawbacks: limited number of extreme events

Daniel HERLEMONT

Page 7 7

Systematic Scenarios  Historical or prospective stress tests may not reveal the most dangerous states of the world  With large portfolios, losses can arise from unexpected combinations of financial risk factors  Approaches  VAR Monte Carlo Analysis can be used to examine the worst loss from simulation Maximum Loss Criterion

Daniel HERLEMONT

Stress Testing Models  critically examine all the steps in the generation of of risk measures, including stress testing models parameters Sensitivity Analysis: the effect of changing the functional form of the models (Derivatives can be priced using different models)  Pricing models may fail in changin environments

 One can test different models and take the worst case to mimizie model risk

Daniel HERLEMONT

Page 8 8

Management Response

Daniel HERLEMONT

Management Response

Daniel HERLEMONT

Page 9 9

Stress Testing Benefits

Daniel HERLEMONT

Extreme Value Theory

Daniel HERLEMONT

Page 10 10

Extreme Value Theory

Daniel HERLEMONT

Extreme Value Theory

Daniel HERLEMONT

Page 11 11

Extreme Value Theory + GARCH

Daniel HERLEMONT

Extreme Value Theory

Daniel HERLEMONT

Page 12 12

Extreme Value Theory

Daniel HERLEMONT

Page 13 13