Process Control and Optimization, VOLUME II - Unicauca

Mechanical damage can occur when opening valve against process vacuum. Temperature Limits: ..... Flow Control,” InTech, November 1986. Sanderson, R. C. ...
328KB taille 28 téléchargements 61 vues
6.22

Valve Types: Saunders Diaphragm Valves C. E. GAYLOR

(1970, 1985)

B. G. LIPTÁK

Weir, full-bore, straight-through, dual-range

Applications:

Slurries, corrosive fluids at low pressure drops

Sizes:

Standard units from /2 to 12 in. (12 to 300 mm); special units up to 20 in. (500 mm)

Maximum Operating Pressure:

In sizes up to 4 in. (100 mm), 150 PSIG (10.3 bar); 6 in. (150 mm), 125 PSIG (8.6 bar); 8 in. (200 mm), 100 PSIG (6.9 bar); and 10 or 12 in. (250 or 300 mm), 65 PSIG (4.5 bar). See Figure 6.22a for limits.

Vacuum Limits:

Mechanical damage can occur when opening valve against process vacuum

Temperature Limits:

With most elastomer diaphragms from 10 to 15°F (–12 to 65°C); with PTFE diaphragm from –30 to 350°F (–34 to 175°C). See Figure 6.22a.

Materials of Construction:

Body materials: iron, ductile iron, steel, 302 to 316 stainless steel, Alloy 20, bronze, Monel, Hastelloy C, aluminum, titanium, graphite, plastic such as PTFE lining or solid plastics Diaphragm materials: Teflon, Buna-N, neoprene, hypalon

Characteristics:

See Figure 6.22b

Capacity:

Cv = 20 d ; see Table 6.22c

Rangeability:

About 10:1; see Section 6.7

Leakage:

ANSI Class IV or V; for definitions see Table 6.1gg

Costs:

Costs vary drastically with design and accessories. In general, the cost of conventional Saunders-type control valves is about half that of globe valves of the same size and materials. (For the costs of carbon steel and stainless steel globe valves, refer to Figure 6.19b.)

Partial List of Suppliers:

ABB Inc. (www.abb.com) Emerson Process Management (www.emersonprocess.com) Foxboro-Invensis (www.foxboro.com) ITT Industries, Engineered Valves (www.engvalves.com) McCanna/Marpac (www.mccannainc.com) Nibco Inc. (www.nibco.com) Teledyne Engineering (www.teledyne.com) Velan Valve Corp. (www.velan.com)

1

2

The advantages of Saunders valves include their relatively low costs, tight shut-off, and suitability for corrosive, dirty, viscous, or slurry services (Table 6.1a). Their limitations include their poor control characteristics, although the use of the dual-range design improves it. They are also limited in their temperature (high and low) and pressure (high) ratings and are not suited for cavitating or flashing services.

© 2006 by Béla Lipták

Flow sheet symbol

Design Types:

INTRODUCTION

1348

(1995, 2005)

The valve coefficients for a number of Saunders valve sizes with a variety of connection types and lining options are tabulated in Table 6.22c. SAUNDERS VALVE CONSTRUCTION The Saunders valve is also referred to as a diaphragm valve or less often as a weir valve. Conventional Saunders valves utilize both the diaphragm and the weir for controlling the

120 100 80 60

m) ½ (31.3 ''−1' − 50 ' mm ) (62.5 1¼''− −75 2'' mm) 2½''− 3 '' (125 −150 mm) 5''− 6 '' (200 m m) 8'' (250−30 0 mm) 1 0''−12''

75 % Flow or Cv

140

5m

Teflon with butyl backing

160

5 −2

Kel -F, black butyl

180

(12.

Hypalon, white butyl

200

1349

100

Neoprene

220

Natural rubber & hycar

Operating pressure (PSIG)*

Pure gum and white natural rubbers

6.22 Valve Types: Saunders Diaphragm Valves

Quickopening

STD. saunders

50 Dual-range saunders 25

0

40

Temperature (°F)** 20 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 *1 PSIG = 6.9 kPa * *°C = °F −32 1.8

FIG. 6.22a Pressure and temperature limitations of the various diaphragm materials used in Saunders valves, as a function of valve size.

0

25

50

75

100

% Lift

FIG. 6.22b The characteristics of conventional Saunders valves are nearly quick opening, while the characteristics of dual-range Saunders valve designs are closer to linear.

flow of the process fluid (Figure 6.22d), while straightthrough and dual-range ones do not necessarily use a weir. The conventional Saunders valve is opened and closed by moving a flexible or elastic diaphragm toward or away from a weir. The elastic diaphragm is moved toward the weir by the pressure applied by a compressor element on the

TABLE 6.22c Valve Coefficients (Cv) of Conventional Saunders Valves* Flanged Ends Nominal Valve Size mm

in.

15

1

20

3

Sanitary Ends

Threaded Ends

3.5

2.6

/2

Unlined 3.5

Neoprene or Rubber Lined 2

Glass Lined

Polypropelene Kynar or Tefzel Lined

3

— —

/4

19

8

21

7

22

25

1

21

16

21

7

22

11

30

1

1 /2

29

26

29

12

39

22

40

1 /2

1

50

44

50

26

54

39

50

2

66

66

66

54

83

69

65

2 /2

1

150



150

105

170

99

80

3

165



165

133

235

160

100

4

290



290

235

365

280

150

6





550

495

805

670

200

8





1050

1050

1625

1000

250

10





1725

1650





300

12





2250

2075





* Courtesy of The Foxboro Co.

© 2006 by Béla Lipták

1350

Control Valve Selection and Sizing

Spindle Adapter bonnet Bonnet bolts & nuts

Compressor pin Compressor Finger plate

FIG. 6.22f Teflon-lined Saunders valve. Body

Diaphragm

FIG. 6.22d The main components of a weir-type Saunders valve.

diaphragm. The compressor is connected to the valve stem, which is moved by the actuator. The diaphragm, which at its center is attached to the compressor, is pulled away from the weir when the compressor is lifted. For high-vacuum service it is often desirable to evacuate the bonnet of the Saunders valve in order to reduce the force that is pulling the diaphragm away from the compressor. This is especially desirable for large valves, where the vacuum might be sufficient to tear the diaphragm from the compressor. The compressor is designed to clear the finger plate, or diaphragm support plate, and to contour the diaphragm so that it matches the weir (Figure 6.22d). The purpose of the finger plate is to support the diaphragm when the compressor has been withdrawn. The finger plate is utilized for valve

Streamline flow in open position

sizes 1 in. (25 mm) and larger. For valves larger than 2 in. (50 mm), the finger plate is built as part of the bonnet. A Saunders valve can be considered as a half pinch valve (Section 6.20). The pinch valve operates as if two diaphragms were moved toward or away from each other, whereas the Saunders valve has only one diaphragm and a fixed weir. Because of their design similarity, their flow characteristics (see Figures 6.20v and 6.20w for pinch valves) are also similar, as it was shown above in Figure 6.22b. Figure 6.22e shows the three basic positions of a conventional Saunders valve. Materials of Construction The body of a conventional Saunders valve (Figure 6.22d), because of its simple and smooth interior, lends itself well to lining with plastics, glass, titanium, zirconium, tantalum, and other corrosion-resistant materials (Figure 6.22f). Valve bodies

Flow control in throttling position

FIG. 6.22e The open, throttling, and closed positions of a conventional Saunders valve.

© 2006 by Béla Lipták

Leak-tightness in closed position

6.22 Valve Types: Saunders Diaphragm Valves

1351

Bonnet bolt Ball brush

Body Compressor

Diaphragm stud Diaphragm

FIG. 6.22h Full-bore Saunders valve.

Compressor insert

FIG. 6.22g The design of a straight-through Saunders valve.

Maintenance requirements of Saunders valves are mainly determined by the diaphragm life, which is a function of the diaphragm’s resistance to the controlled process fluid (which may be corrosive or erosive) and also of the operating pressure and temperature (Figure 6.22a).

are available in iron, stainless and cast steels, alloys, and plastics. Iron bodies are lined with plastic, glass, special metals, and ceramics. As it was shown in Table 6.22c, lining lowers the valve capacity of smaller Saunders valves (under 2 in., or 50 mm) by about 25% below that of the unlined ones (Table 6.22c). The diaphragm for the conventional Saunders valve is available in a wide range of materials. These include polyethylene, Tygon, white nail rubber, gum rubber, hycar, natural rubber, neoprene, hypalon, black butyl, KEL-F, and Teflon, with various backings, including silicone. Some of these diaphragms also contain reinforcement fibers.

Straight-Through Design The valve seat of the straight-through diaphragm valve is not the conventional weir. Here the compressor is contoured to meet the walls of the body itself (Figure 6.22g). The longer stem stroke of the straight-through valve necessitates a very flexible diaphragm. The increased flexure requirement tends to shorten the life of the diaphragm, but the valve’s smooth, self-draining, straight-through flow pattern makes it applicable for hard-to-handle materials, such as slurry.

Springs Inner compressor Outer compressor

75% open

10% open

Dual-range design

Conventional design

FIG. 6.22i The shape of the openings of a 10 and 75% open Saunders valves are compared in the dual-range (left) and single-range (right) designs.

© 2006 by Béla Lipták

1352

Control Valve Selection and Sizing

The flow characteristic of the straight-through design is more nearly linear than those of the conventional Saunders valves.

When the inner compressor is opened to its limit, the outer compressor begins to open. From this point on, both compressors move as a unit. When wide open, this valve provides the same flow capacity as its conventional counterpart.

Full Bore Valve The body of a full-bore Saunders valve is modified to provide a special shape to the weir. As a result, the opening of the internal flow path is fully rounded at all points, permitting ball brush cleaning (Figure 6.22h). This is an important feature in the food industry, where a smooth, easy-to-clean interior surface is required. Dual-Range Design The rangeability and flow characteristics of a conventional Saunders valve are rather poor, and so it is not suitable if high precision control is required. The flow characteristics of the dual-range design is an improvement, in comparison to the characteristics of the conventional Saunders. The dual-range valve contains two compressors, which provide independent control over two areas of the diaphragm (Figure 6.22i). The first increments of stem travel raise only the inner compressor from the weir. This allows flow through a contoured opening in the center of the valve. This is superior to the operation of the single-range design, where the corresponding flow is the result of a slit across the entire weir. This improvement in the shape of the value opening helps prevent clogging and the dewatering of stock and it also keeps abrasion at a minimum. In this dual-range design, while springs hold the outer compressor firmly seated, the inner compressor may be positioned independently to provide accurate control over small amounts of flow.

© 2006 by Béla Lipták

Bibliography Bialkowski, B., Coughran, M., and Beall, J., “Control Valve Performance Update—The Last 10 Years,” Pulp Pap-Canada, (102):21-22, November 2001. Bishop, T., Chapeaux, M., Jaffer, L., et.al., “Ease Control Valve Selection,” Chem Eng Prog, 98 (11): 52–56, November 2002. Borden, G. and Friedmann, P. G. (eds.), Control Valves—Practical Guides for Measurement and Control, Research Triangle Park, NC: Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Society, 1998. Cain, F. M., “Solving the Problem of Cavitation in Control Valves,” Paper #91-0462, 1991 ISA Conference, Anaheim, CA, October 1992. Carey, J. A., “Control Valve Update,” Instruments and Control Systems, January 1981. Control Valve Handbook, 3rd edition, Marshalltown, IA: Fisher Controls International Inc., 2001. Control Valve Seat Leakage, FCI 70-2-2003, Cleveland, OH: Fluid Controls Institute, Inc., 2003, (www.fluidcontrolsinstitute.org). “Control Valves—Globe, Plug, Pinch, Needle, Gate,” Measurements and Control, February 1994. Cunningham, E. R., “Solutions to Valve Operating Problems,” Plant Engineering, September 4, 1980. Fernbaugh, A., “Control Valves: A Decade of Change,” Instruments and Control Systems, January 1980. Monsen, J. F., “Valve Wars—Rising Stem vs. Rotary,” Plant Services, January 1999. Rahmeyer, W., “The Critical Flow Limit and Pressure Recovery Factor for Flow Control,” InTech, November 1986. Sanderson, R. C., “Elastomer Coatings: Hope for Cavitation Resistance,” InTech, April 1983. Whatever Happened To... A Guide to Industrial Valve and Actuator Companies—Past and Present, Washington, D.C.: Valve Manufacturers Association, 1997.