Impact of Agropastoral Management on Wind ... - Wiley Online Library

horizontal fluxes. Thus, rather than being intended to pro- .... port tools for rainfed crops in the Sahel at the plot and regional scales. In A practical guide to .... Field Crops. Research 40: 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(94)00094-S.
348KB taille 5 téléchargements 231 vues
land degradation & development Land Degrad. Develop. (2017) Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI: 10.1002/ldr.2783

IMPACT OF AGROPASTORAL MANAGEMENT ON WIND EROSION IN SAHELIAN CROPLANDS Caroline Pierre1*

, Laurent Kergoat2, Pierre Hiernaux3, Christian Baron4, Gilles Bergametti1 , Jean-Louis Rajot1,5, Amadou Abdourhamane Toure6, Gregory S. Okin7, Beatrice Marticorena1

1

Laboratoire Interuniversitaire des Systèmes Atmosphériques (LISA), Universités Paris Est Créteil and Paris Diderot, UMR CNRS 7583, 61 Avenue du Général de Gaulle, 94000 Créteil, France 2 Géosciences Environnement Toulouse (GET), CNRS/IRD/Université de Toulouse, 14 Avenue Edouard Belin, 31400 Toulouse, France 3 Pastoralisme Conseil (PASTOC), 30 chemin de Jouanal, 82160 Caylus, France 4 Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (CIRAD), 500 Rue Jean François Breton, 34093 Montpellier Cedex 5, France 5 Institut d’Ecologie et des Sciences de l’Environnement (IEES-Paris), UMR IRD 242, Institut des Régions Arides (IRA), 4119 Médenine, Tunisia 6 Département de Géologie, Jeune Equipe Associée à l’IRD, Anthropisation et Dynamique Eolienne (JEAI ADE), Université Abdou Moumouni, BP 10662 Niamey, Niger 7 Department of Geography, University of California Los Angeles, 1255 Bunche Hall, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA Received 28 March 2017; Revised 9 August 2017; Accepted 16 August 2017

ABSTRACT In the Sahel, climate change and demographic growth are raising major concerns about the ability of crop yields to support the local population. Agropastoral management affects wind erosion (e.g., through crop residue management and tillage practices, which modify surface characteristics), which itself substantially affects soil fertility and thus crop yields. There is therefore a need to assess the potential impact of the main Sahelian cropping practices – like sowing, manuring, and crop residue management – on wind erosion. Using a modeling approach adapted to an experimental site located in southwestern Niger over the period 2006–2012, and scenarios that describe a set of agropastoral practices, the impacts of these practices on wind erosion are simulated and compared. The results indicate that horizontal fluxes differ by a factor of 10 among scenarios, with annual horizontal fluxes ranging from 121 to 1,317 kg m1. Modeled wind erosion is most sensitive to the mass of crop residues in the late dry season, but different practices dealing with crop growth or with crop residue management may result in fluxes of the similar magnitude. The collection of the crop residues after grain harvest increases wind erosion, whereas grazing might have mixed effects, probably further mediated by the mobility of livestock as a response to forage availability. The seasonal dynamics of the monthly cumulated horizontal fluxes vary depending on practice; however, the annual cumulated horizontal fluxes are closely correlated with meteorological conditions such as wind speed and rainfall in the previous year. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. key words:

aeolian erosion; agropastoral practices; semiarid; land use management; modeling

INTRODUCTION Wind erosion is one of the main processes leading to land degradation in arid and semiarid regions (e.g., Lal, 1994). Through transport of the finest particles of the soil surface, wind erosion can induce a loss of nutrients and organic matter and a decrease of the water holding capacity of the soil (Sterk, 2003). This issue is particularly critical in semiarid regions, where the land surface is used for agropastoral activities, which requires maintaining soil fertility over time. In Algeria, Houyou et al. (2016) have shown that steppe conversion into cropland has led to large wind erosion rates and subsequent soil losses five times larger than a tolerable threshold, indicating an unsustainable land management. Similarly, cultivation has been found to increase wind erosion in drylands of Australia (McTainsh et al., 2011) and the USA (Webb et al., 2014), where agricultural practices dominate over climatic variability in determining wind *Correspondence to: C. Pierre, Laboratoire Interuniversitaire des Systèmes Atmosphériques (LISA), Universités Paris Est Créteil and Paris Diderot, UMR CNRS 7583, 61 Avenue du Général de Gaulle, 94000 Créteil, France. E-mail: [email protected]

Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

erosion dynamics (Nordstrom & Hotta, 2004). Conversely, tillage practices might reduce the soil susceptibility to wind erosion: in northwestern USA, Sharratt et al. (2012) estimated soil loss from minimum tillage to be 50% of conventional tillage due to greater residue cover. Numerous studies have investigated the impact of tillage on wind erosion, for example, in Argentina (Mendez & Buschiazzo, 2010), in the Netherlands (Riksen & Visser, 2008), and in Spain (Fister & Ries, 2009). Grazing (Aubault et al., 2015) and trampling (Fister & Ries, 2009; Baddock et al., 2011) may also amplify wind erosion in susceptible drylands, depending on livestock management and land type characteristics. Among semiarid regions, the Sahel is characterized by a demographic growth among the highest in the world (United Nation, 2015). Climate projections in this region indicate a warming and changes in rain seasonality in the coming century (Sylla et al., 2015), although these estimates are associated with significant uncertainty (Roehrig et al., 2013). The vulnerability of Sahelian societies to climate variability is exacerbated by nutrient-poor soils (Breman et al., 2001) and wind-driven soil erosion (Buerkert et al., 2001).

C. PIERRE ET AL.

Rural populations in this region rely mostly on subsistence agriculture. The capacity of crop yields to feed these populations nowadays and in the coming decades is therefore a major concern. Latest land use maps of West Africa based on photointerpretation (CILSS, 2016) show that Sahelian cropland area has increased during the last decades: for example, cultivated areas in Niger have increased from 12·6% in 1975 to 24·5% in 2013. This trend is also shown in most of the cases reviewed by Van Vliet et al. (2013) over the Sahel and is mainly due to population increase. Expansion of the cultivated area is indeed the most widespread strategy to increase crop production in this region, due to the limited possibilities for intensification (Rasmussen & Reenberg, 2015). In addition to this cropland expansion, changes in agricultural practices further impact wind erosion. In the Sahel, previous work has shown that wind erosion is enhanced by cropping (Rajot, 2001; Sterk, 2003; Pierre et al., 2015). Net soil loss due to wind erosion in 1 year can reduce the soil nutrient content by approximately the same order of magnitude as the nutrient uptake by millet in 1 year (Drees et al., 1993; Bielders et al., 2002; Sterk, 2003). Moulin & Chiapello (2006) have also suggested that land use change has modified Sahelian dust emission at a regional scale during the 20th century. To date, studies dedicated to the effects of agropastoral practices on Sahelian wind erosion have been mostly provided by experiments at the plot scale, focusing on crop residue management and on deposition of wind-blown particles into fallows (e.g., Michels et al., 1995; Bielders et al., 2002; Sterk, 2003; Abdourhamane Touré et al., 2011). Some studies provided recommendations on the amount of crop residue that should be left on the field after harvest to reduce wind erosion (Michels et al., 1995; Buerkert et al., 1997). Approximately 2,000 kg ha1 of crop residue clearly inhibited wind erosion, but effects of 500 kg ha1 were also acknowledged (see also Abdourhamane Touré et al., 2011). However, the application of 2,000 kg ha1 was considered hardly achievable by farmers due to plant production limitation (Sterk, 2003; Ikazaki et al., 2011). Additionally, crop residues, the management of which depends on socioeconomic factors, are increasingly collected by farmers to be sold or to feed livestock (Akponikpe et al., 2014; Schlecht & Buerkert, 2004; Rasmussen & Reenberg, 2015; Valbuena et al., 2015). Subsequently, there is a decrease in the amount of protective residue on the surface. The diverse impacts of Sahelian agropastoral practices (e.g., sowing, manuring, grazing, diversity of cropped species, and varieties) on wind erosion have not yet been fully explored. The existing studies do not provide a clear view of the relative effects of such practices and climate variability because of inherent limitations of experimental work (e.g., number of practices that can be tested and duration of the experiment). Such comparison could be documented by using models, but there is currently a lack of studies using coupled modeling for cropping practices and wind erosion in the Sahel. Yet, the ongoing and future Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

changes in Sahelian land use and agropastoral practices call for the use of modeling to estimate the impacts of such changes in terms of wind erosion in the coming decades. The objective of the present study is to determine, with a modeling framework, how Sahelian agropastoral practices affect wind erosion over a pluriannual period and to identify the practices that most enhance or limit wind erosion. In that purpose, we design simulations according to a set of scenarios representing typical Sahelian practices. We use a crop growth model coupled to a wind erosion model. Both models, as well as their coupling, have been previously tested for Sahelian conditions by comparison with measurements. Pluriannual meteorological data continuously recorded over an agricultural site located in southwestern Niger are used as input data to run the two models. The results are analyzed in terms of sensitivity of wind erosion to Sahelian agropastoral practices.

MATERIAL AND METHODS Study Site and Data The Sahel exhibits a short rainy season from June to October, which triggers the seasonal growth of vegetation, followed by a long dry season (Lebel & Ali, 2009). Mean annual precipitation ranges between 100 and 600 mm; most of it is brought by a few mesoscale convective systems that induce strong winds just before the start of the rain. Thus, most wind erosion occurs during the late dry season and beginning of the rainy season, when vegetation cover is low and strong winds are frequent (Abdourhamane Touré et al., 2011; Marticorena et al., 2016). Only a few species are cropped in the Sahel, the main rainfed staples being millet and sorghum. Agropastoral practices are diverse for these two crops (Sterk, 2003; Marteau et al., 2011; Traoré et al., 2011). Farmers select breeds depending on soil and climate conditions and choose sowing density, sowing date, and manure management depending on environmental, economic, and cultural factors (Roudier et al., 2016; Schlecht & Buerkert, 2004); tillage is rare in the area. Commonly, after harvest, some stalks are collected and/or livestock is given access to the fields to eat the remaining residues and to provide manure. Then, field clearing consists of laying down the remaining standing vegetation before the following rainy season (Abdourhamane Touré et al., 2011). Some of these practices specifically impact crop growth, like the sowing date and the application of manure, whereas crop residue management modifies the surface cover during the dry season. This modeling study is based on a study site that is a millet field of 100 × 150 m, located on a more than 3 × 4 km quaternary aeolian sand deposit homogeneously covered by fields and fallows, close to the Banizoumbou village (13·52°N, 2·63°E) in southwestern Niger, approximately 60 km east of Niamey (Abdourhamane Touré et al., 2011; Figure 1). The soil is very sandy (95%), which is typical of Sahelian croplands (Schlecht & Buerkert, 2004). The field LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, (2017)

AGROPASTORAL MANAGEMENT IMPACT ON WIND EROSION IN SAHELIAN CROPLANDS

Figure 1. Map of Niger with Niamey (blue square) and the study site near Banizoumbou (red square), with a picture of the study site on 8 August 2006. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

is cultivated by local farmers following their usual practices, and it is thus representative of cultivated fields in the area. Meteorological data (wind velocity, air temperature, relative humidity, and precipitation) were constantly monitored (except when technical problems) from 2006 to 2012 at 6·5-m height with 5-min time resolution (Marticorena et al., 2016). There is considerable interannual variability of wind and rainfall within this period (Table I). Radiation, which is also required as input data for the crop growth model, is provided by the European Center for MediumRange Weather Forecast (ERA-interim reanalysis).

vegetation mass, grain yield, and leaf area index (LAI), as well as the major phenological stages (germination, vegetative period, reproductive period, and grain maturation and desiccation; see Figure S1 for details). As inputs, it requires daily meteorological data (rainfall, air temperature and relative humidity, radiation, and wind speed), soil characteristics (e.g., water holding capacity), and information about agropastoral practices. The effects of soil fertility (e.g., due to manuring) are taken into account through a coefficient of vegetation production. Recent improvements for dry-season vegetation provide the mass of standing stalks and litter, accounting for the effect of grazing and trampling on crop residue, and for biotic and abiotic factors driving residue decomposition (Pierre et al., 2015). The DPM has been widely used for regional dust emission modeling (e.g., Laurent et al., 2008; Darmenova et al., 2009; Pierre et al., 2012, 2014) and for wind erosion simulations (Pierre et al., 2014, 2015). DPM estimates horizontal aeolian fluxes by using surface wind friction velocity and surface characteristics (e.g., texture and nonerodible elements). In particular, it has been validated at the field scale against experimental data obtained in semiarid regions of Spain and Niger (Gomes et al., 2003). Wind erosion occurs when the shear stress exerted by the wind on the surface is greater than a threshold. The drag of the wind on the surface is distributed between the obstacles (pebbles and vegetation) and the bare soil according to a drag partitioning scheme, which depends

Modeling Approach Two models are used here to assess the impact of the agropastoral practices on wind erosion: SarraH (Systèmes d’Analyze Régionale des Risques Agroclimatiques version 3·3; Dingkuhn et al., 2003) simulates crop growth, and the DPM (dust production model; Marticorena & Bergametti, 1995) simulates wind erosion. When coupled (Surface Characteristics section), these two models have been shown to produce reasonable estimates of millet growth and wind erosion for the Banizoumbou study site (Pierre et al., 2014, 2015). SarraH has been widely tested and used for several millet breeds in Senegal, Mali, and Niger (Baron et al., 2005; Kouressy et al., 2008; Marteau et al., 2011; Traoré et al., 2011). This model simulates, at a daily time step, the

Table I. Wind and rainfall characteristics at Banizoumbou station, computed from 5-min resolution measurements Year Annual rainfall (mm) Proportion of wind >7 m s1 (%) Missing data (%)

2006 533 2·2 0·13

2007 471 2·3 0·30

2008 698 2·1 0·67

2009 307 1·4 7·16

2010 371 1·7 1·38

2011 349 1·4 0·57

2012 807 1.5 5·24

Mean 505 1·8 2·21

Missing data affect especially periods of the year at the core or at the end of the rainy season (late August and early October 2009 and mid-November 2012), thus when vegetation has well grown up and protect the soil from wind erosion, and not periods of the year that are the most prone to wind erosion (May–June). Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, (2017)

C. PIERRE ET AL.

on the surface aerodynamic roughness length z0 (Marticorena & Bergametti, 1995). Wind drag only acts on the fraction of erodible surface that is not covered by vegetation (see Figure S2 for details). Soil moisture was not monitored at Banizoumbou; thus, the simulated wind erosion is set to zero for rains larger than 1 mm in 1 h, from rain start to 12 h afterward, following Bergametti et al. (2016). Horizontal wind erosion fluxes are provided in kg m1 per time unit (e.g., per year), which refers to the total mass of soil particles crossing a 1-m wide vertical plane perpendicular to wind direction with infinite height, during this time unit. Thus, 1 kg m1 corresponds to 0·1 t ha1, assuming that the horizontal flux is at equilibrium and exits a 100 × 100 m field oriented along the direction of large wind speeds, with no incoming material from the surrounding plots. The contribution of wind to the overall interannual variability of simulated horizontal fluxes was characterized by using the dust uplift potential (DUP; Marsham et al., 2011). DUP is an index for potential wind erosion, irrespective of variations in the surface characteristics. For time step i, it is calculated as    Ut U 2t 3 1 2 (1) DUPi ¼ U 1 þ U U Where: U is the wind speed and Ut is the threshold value in the preceding texts, which transport is thought to potentially occur. Because the DUP characterizes the potential contribution of wind speed to wind erosion, we use a constant Ut corresponding to a Sahelian bare soil. The value of 7 m s1 at 6·5 m high has been selected to be consistent with the determination of Ut performed by Abdourhamane Touré et al. (2011) on a bare soil in Bainizoumbou. Here, 5-min time steps were used. Annual DUP (hereafter DUP, in m3 s3) is computed by summing instantaneous DUPi over a full year. Surface Characteristics SarraH outputs (i.e., LAI and vegetation mass BM) provide input surface characteristics for the DPM (fractional cover fcv and surface aerodynamic roughness z0; Pierre et al., 2015; see also Figure S1). Specifically, SarraH-derived LAIstd (for standing vegetation, in m2 m2) is the sum of LAI of green vegetation, computed directly in the model, and LAI of standing residue LAIs (also in m2 m2). LAIs is calculated from dry leaf mass BMLeavess: LAIs ¼ SLA:BMLeavess

(2)

assuming a specific leaf area (SLA) of 0·018 m2 g1 (a typical value for the end of the millet growth according to SarraH). The fractional cover of green and dry standing vegetation is computed as  (3) f cv std ¼ 1  eK LAIstd Where: std means standing and K = 0·45. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The fractional cover of litter (i.e., flat, soil-covering senescent vegetation) is computed as f cv lit ¼

ð0:14 BMlit þ 0:23Þ 100

(4)

Where: BMlit is the litter mass (in g m2; Abdourhamane Touré et al., 2011). The total fractional cover fcv is the sum of fcv std and fcv lit. Pierre et al. (2015) used 3 years of measurements (2006– 2008) to parameterize z0 from standing millet height. This parameterization only accounted for the variation of plant growth dynamics, but not for the interannual variability in millet mass. Variations in vegetation mass have a significant impact on the aerodynamic roughness (Pierre et al., 2014), and therefore, a new parameterization was developed to take this factor into account. The vegetation mass, Mtot, simulated in SarraH at the beginning of plant growth is much lower than values that might be consistent with the observed changes in roughness z0 at the study site during this period. Thus, a modified vegetation mass, Mtot cor is computed from a linear interpolation of the simulated Mtot from germination to the beginning of the reproductive stage (and Mtot cor = Mtot during the rest of the time). The new parametrization of z0 is then based on a regression between this modified vegetation mass Mtot cor of a reference SarraH simulation (from Pierre et al., 2015) and z0 at Banizoumbou over 2006–2008: z0 ¼ 0:00036 M tot cor

(5)

Where: Mtot cor is in g m2 and z0 is in m. When only litter is present (from field clearing to the following germination): z0 ¼ 0:0012 lnðf cv Þ þ 0:0013

(6)

following Abdourhamane Touré et al. (2011). At the beginning of plant growth, the new vegetation is still very small and would result in a low surface roughness, whereas litter may remain from the previous growing year, possibly inducing a larger surface roughness. Therefore, z0 is calculated as the maximum of Equations 5 and 6 during this period, which is to say that z0 is controlled by old litter until new vegetation induces a greater roughness. The lowest possible roughness lengths is the aerodynamic roughness length of the bare soil z0s, which has been determined from field measurements (z0s = 9·7 105 m; Pierre et al., 2015). Using this new approach (the maximum of results from Equations 5 and 6), the correlation between modeled and measure-based z0 is R = 0·76 (n = 555), with RMSE = 0·63. This is a significant improvement over the previous parameterization used in Pierre et al. (2015) (R = 0·46 with RMSE = 1·05). Scenarios Scenarios were designed to focus on Sahelian agropastoral practices that might have noticeable impacts on wind erosion, by changing one parameter (corresponding to one practice) at a time among the parameters that define a reference scenario LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, (2017)

AGROPASTORAL MANAGEMENT IMPACT ON WIND EROSION IN SAHELIAN CROPLANDS

(Ref). This reference scenario is based on local observations in the millet field at Banizoumbou by Abdourhamane Touré et al. (2011) and was simulated in Pierre et al. (2015). Then, each scenario assesses the impact of one practice individually with the parameters ranging within realistic values for Sahelian conditions (Table II). In doing so, we aim to isolate the effect of specific agropastoral practices that have not yet been examined in terms of their impacts on wind erosion in the Sahel: crop choice, sowing date, sowing density, use of manure, residue management, and grazing. Crop choice: Following observations in southwestern Niger by Saidou et al. (2010) and Marteau et al. (2011), one sorghum and three millet varieties (reference Hainy Kirey, long cycle Somno, both photoperiod-sensitive; and short cycle Souna) are included in the simulations. Although rainfall in Banizoumbou is rather low for sorghum, other studies have observed this crop in southern and southwestern Niger (Schlecht & Buerkert, 2004; Valbuena et al., 2015) and even in eastern Niger (Bezançon et al., 2009). Sowing date: Sowing is mostly done at the beginning of the rainy season, but it can also be done before the rainy season starts or even during the early part of the rainy season (Saidou et al., 2010; Marteau et al., 2011). In our modeling, we used three sowing scenarios representing these three approaches. The Early Sow scenario depicts the “dry-seeding” strategy: From 1 April, seed germination can occur if the soil water content is large enough. Sowing density: In practice, seeds are sown in holes spread across a field and plants are thinned after germination during the first weeks of growth (Marteau et al., 2011). In the simulations, it is assumed that fields are also weeded at the beginning of crop growth and that each hole has three plants after thinning. Under these conditions, simulated plant densities are set to 10,000plants ha1 at the lowest and reach up to 50,000 plants ha1, in agreement with previous studies in southwestern Niger (Buerkert et al., 1997; Saidou et al., 2010; Marteau et al., 2011), although these values are relatively high for the study site strictly speaking (Hiernaux & Turner, 2002).

Use of manure: Manuring is a common practice in the study area (de Ridder et al., 2004; Andrieu et al., 2015; Valbuena et al., 2015); its effects on soil fertility in the model are expressed by modifying the coefficient of vegetation production in SarraH. Crop residue management: Three crop residue management practices are simulated based on observations in southwestern Niger (e.g., Akponikpe et al., 2014): collection (to be used as forage) or flattening of (i) none, (ii) half, or (iii) all of the residues after harvest. Fields are cleared (i.e., remaining standing vegetation is laid down as litter) at different dates during the dry season, until the latest possible (in June) just before the start of the following rainy season. Grazing: In the simulations, grazing pressure ranges between no grazing and 50 TLU km2 (tropical livestock units). The high value is observed in heavily grazed Sahelian areas, but it would likely not apply during several months as simulated here because livestock are typically moved to places with more forage. Permutations of these various agropastoral choices result in a series of 18 scenarios, with names related to the parameter that is changed compared with the reference scenario. For example, in the No Graze scenario, all parameters are the same as in the Ref scenario except that there is no simulated grazing pressure. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Total Wind Erosion For the period 2006–2012, mean annual simulated horizontal flux is 794 kg m1 for the reference scenario (Ref). The scenario with the highest annual mean (1,317 kg m1) was the one in which all crop residue is collected (Tot HarvRes). The result for the maximum grazing pressure (Max Graze) was very similar (1,298 kg m1) to the Tot HarvRes scenario. The No Graze scenario produces the lowest mean annual flux (121 kg m1), an order of magnitude lower than Tot HarvRes. The other scenarios yield fluxes between 475 (Late FClear) and 1,015 kg m1 (Tot LayRes; Figure 2).

Table II. Parameters describing agropastoral practices in the SarraH crop model and names of the associated scenarios (in italics) Agropastoral management scenarios and parameters Practices Plant species Millet variety Sowing date Sowing density (plants ha1) Manure effect (g MJ1) Harvested residues (%) Laid down residues (%) Grazing pressure (TLU km2) Date of field clearing

Reference parameters Millet Hainy Kirey 7 June 10,000 4 0 0 5 1 Jan

Scenario 1 Sorghum ShortC Mil Early Sow Mean Dens No Man Mean HarvRes Mean LayRes No Graze Mean FClear

Parameter 1 Sorghum Souna 1 April 30,000 3·6 0.5 0.5 0 1 Mar

Scenario 2 LongC Mil Late Sow Max Dens Max Man Tot HarvRes Tot LayRes Max Graze Late FClear

Parameter 2 Somno 1 July 50,000 4·4 1 1 50 1 Jun

Values for the “reference” scenario (second column) are taken from Pierre et al. (2015). For each scenario, all parameters but one (fourth and sixth columns) are the same as in the reference scenario. SarraH, Systèmes d’Analyze Régionale des Risques Agroclimatiques; TLU, tropical livestock units. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, (2017)

1200

50

1000

25

800

0

600

-25

400

-50

200

-75

%

kg.m-1

C. PIERRE ET AL.

-100

N o La Gr te az M FC e ea n lea F r Lo Cle ng ar M CM ax i D l M en ax s M ea Ma n n D en s Ea R rly ef L S M ate ow ea S M n L ow ea a y n H R es ar vR N es o So Ma r n Sh ghu o m To rtC t L Mi l M ayR a e To x G s t H raz ar e vR es

0

Figure 2. Mean annual simulated horizontal fluxes over 2006–2012 for all scenarios and their difference (in %) from the reference flux. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

and trampling (difference between No Graze and Max Graze: 1,177 kg m1) and residue collection (difference between Tot HarvRes and Ref: 524 kg m1) have the greatest impact on fluxes, whereas sowing date (18 kg m1 between Early Sow and Late Sow) and sowing density (117 kg m1 between Max Dens and Ref) have the smallest impact on fluxes. In between, the date of field clearing, millet variety, manuring, flattening residue at harvest, and crop type have decreasing impacts on horizontal flux. There is greater impact on simulated flux between millet varieties than between reference millet and sorghum because the sorghum variety selected here exhibits similar crop growth and dynamics as the reference millet. Overall, practices that affect crop residue exert the greatest control on horizontal aeolian fluxes, whereas practices related to green vegetation exert less control on fluxes. 1200 1000

kg.m-1

800 600 400 200

an ay R es -R ef rg hu m M R ax ef La D te en So sR w ef -E ar ly So w

il

tL

So

ax

an -

M To

M

M

M

M

ar

C

le

ng ilLo N o

-R ef

FC

te

Sh

or tC

-L a

R es R ef

ar v tH

To

ax

G ra

ze

-N

o

G ra

ze

0

M

For comparison, the traditionally managed millet field at Banizoumbou was observed by Abdourhamane Touré et al. (2011) to have a total horizontal flux of 900 kg m1 over 2006–2008, corresponding to an annual mean flux of 300 kg m1. A nearby bare plot experienced 1,300 kg m1 average annual horizontal flux. Bielders et al. (2004) reported average annual horizontal flux of approximately 300 kg m1 for a millet field from 1996 to 1998. The mean annual simulated fluxes in Pierre et al. (2015), which used a slightly different wind speed dataset, were about 500 kg m1 for 2006–2008. Simulations suggest that different practices can lead to similar final values of mean annual horizontal flux. For instance, maximum sowing density (Max Dens) and use of manure (Max Man) – both of which involve an increase in vegetation mass compared with Ref – yield similar values (Figure 2). In addition, the scenarios with mean harvest of residues (Mean HarvRes) and no manure (No Man) yield similar values, as do the sorghum scenario (Sorghum), the short-cycle millet scenario (ShortC Mil), and the laying down all the residues after harvest scenario (Tot LayRes). Early sowing (Early Sow) yields similar mean annual flux estimates as Ref because it induces a slightly earlier germination (and thus harvest) only when the rainy season starts earlier than usual (1 year out of 7, in 2006). Assuming that each time series of seven annual values (i.e., for each scenario, over 2006–2012) follows a normal distribution, Fisher’s tests and t-tests show that these annual fluxes are significantly different from the reference value for almost all scenarios. Only LongC Mil, Early Sow, and Late Sow simulations are too close to the reference scenario to exhibit significantly different horizontal fluxes. Figure 3 illustrates the impact of specific agropastoral practices by showing the differences between related scenarios at the end of the parameter space. For instance, grazing

Figure 3. Difference in mean annual simulated horizontal fluxes between scenarios over 2006–2012. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com] LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, (2017)

AGROPASTORAL MANAGEMENT IMPACT ON WIND EROSION IN SAHELIAN CROPLANDS

a) kg.m-1

400

Max Graze No Graze Ref

200

0 2008

g.m-2

102

Apr

Jul

Oct

2009

Apr

Jul

Oct

2010

Apr

Jul

Oct

2009

Apr

Jul

Oct

2010

b)

100

10-2 2008

Figure 4. Monthly horizontal flux (a) and total vegetation mass (b, in logarithmic scale) for Max Graze, No Graze, and Ref scenarios in 2008 and 2009. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

Seasonal Dynamics Simulated horizontal fluxes cumulated monthly are shown in Figure 4 for the Max Graze, No Graze, and Ref scenarios. Years 2008 and 2009 are shown due to the differing frequency of large winds (Table I) in these years. Wind erosion mostly occurs during the first half of the year, with May to July exhibiting the highest fluxes (Figure 4a). Flux begins earlier in the year for Max Graze (January–February) compared with Ref (April). In No Graze, flux begins even later (May). This temporal behavior is driven by the difference in residue cover (Figure 4b). New vegetation growth starts in July, and millet mass reaches a maximum – similar for the three scenarios – at the end of September. Simulated vegetation mass reaches a maximum of about 400 g m2 in all the three scenarios, in agreement with observations in millet fields from Niamey area of 300 to 500 g m1 in 2004–2009 (Marteau et al., 2011), although this is larger than millet mass of 200 to 300 g m2 reported by Rockström & de Rouw (1997) for fields in Banizoumbou in 1994–1996.

In the No Graze scenario, some residue remains at the end of the dry season, reducing wind erosion during spring. In the Ref scenario, the surface is also protected by a small amount of residue in the middle of the dry season (e.g., about 7 g m2 in April 2009). In the Max Graze scenario, residue disappears in about 2 months, leaving the soil without protection for the remainder of the dry season. Although the maximum effect of grazing is likely overestimated in our simulations, these results underscore the importance of crop residues during the spring to mitigate horizontal transport. Different millet varieties result in considerable differences in simulated horizontal fluxes (Figure 2). The difference between millet varieties in monthly horizontal flux is clearly visible during the main erosive period (April to July), when only litter remains before next germination (Figure 5a). During this period, fluxes are greater for ShortC Mil than for Ref and are, in turn, greater than in the LongC Mil scenario. In the ShortC Mil scenario, the growth cycle (~2·5 months) is shorter than in the Ref (~3·5 months) and

kg.m-1

a) ShortC Mil LongC Mil Ref

400

200

0 2009

g.m-2

102

Apr

Jul

Oct

2010

Apr

Jul

Oct

2011

Apr

Jul

Oct

2010

Apr

Jul

Oct

2011

b)

100

10-2 2009

Figure 5. Monthly horizontal flux (a) and total vegetation mass (b, in logarithmic scale) for ShortC Mil, LongC Mil, and Ref scenarios in 2009 and 2010. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com] Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, (2017)

C. PIERRE ET AL.

LongC Mil (~4 months) scenarios. Thus, crop residue starts decreasing earlier in ShortC Mil than in the other scenarios, resulting in greater flux. Furthermore, the short cycle variety allocates proportionally more matter to grains than Ref and LongC Mil, resulting in a lower difference in the mass of crop residue after harvest than in total vegetation mass before harvest (Figure 5b). Thus, although the ShortC Mil scenario’s maximum vegetation mass is greater than Ref for some years (not shown), the earlier decrease leads to lower residue cover during the spring at the beginning of the following growing season resulting in greater overall fluxes. The vegetation mass in the LongC Mil scenario can be lower or higher than the vegetation mass in the Ref scenario depending on the year, that is, depending on when millet undergoes water stress. But the decrease in residue cover starts later in the LongC Mil scenario due to longer growing period compared with ShortC Mil and Ref. Thus, depending on the details of the year’s precipitation, when LongC Mil produces greater maximum vegetation mass than Ref, the corresponding flux in the following dry season is lower than that of Ref (years 2006 to 2009 and 2012). Conversely, when LongC Mil produces less vegetation mass than Ref, the simulated horizontal flux in the following dry season is higher than that of Ref (in 2010 and 2011). Different practices can lead to varying seasonal fluxes that nonetheless result in similar total fluxes. For example, for the No Man and Mean HarvRes scenarios (corresponding to crop growth and crop residue management, respectively), the monthly horizontal fluxes are greater for Mean HarvRes than No Man at the beginning of the rainy season (May and June), but they are greater for No Man than Mean HarvRes during the middle of the rainy season (July–August) (Figure 6a). Partial collection of crop residues yields lower 250

litter mass for Mean HarvRes compared with No Man during the dry season (Figure 6b), resulting in greater horizontal flux. Conversely, No Man results in a later increase in vegetation mass at the beginning of crop growth; thus, the horizontal flux is larger during this period for No Man compared with Ref and Mean HarvRes. This pattern is consistent across all years of the study period (not shown). Interannual Variability of Wind Erosion Annual flux tends to increase when DUP becomes larger, as illustrated in Figure 7 where annual horizontal fluxes for all scenarios are drawn versus the annual DUP in a boxplot. However, this trend does not strictly apply for all years, partly due to the temporal distribution of the strongest winds. Specifically, strong winds in June (when most scenarios have the lowest cover) significantly contribute to total horizontal fluxes (Figures 4–6). For instance, 2008 exhibits the greatest DUP, but the frequency of winds higher than 7 m s1 in June 2008 is only 3·9%, compared with 5·7% and 6·9% for 2006 and 2007, respectively. As a result, 2006 and 2007 experience higher fluxes than 2008. The variability among scenarios of annual horizontal fluxes is high for all years. The differences between the 25th and 75th percentiles (edges of the boxes in Figure 7) vary between ~200 and ~400 kg m1 yr1 and tend to increase with DUP. But this value represents a decreasing proportion (from about 50% – 75% in 2012 – to 30%) of the median annual flux (middle line in the boxes), suggesting that the more wind conditions favor erosion, the less agropastoral practices exert an influence on annual flux. The low outliers in Figure 7 (for which the difference from the median is larger than an interquartile) correspond to the No Graze (no wind erosion occurs for that scenario from 2010 onward, due to crop residues that remain from

a)

kg.m-1

200 No Man Mean HarvRes Ref

150 100 50 0 2011

Apr

Jul

Oct

2012

Apr

Jul

Oct

Apr

Jul

Oct

2012

Apr

Jul

Oct

b)

g.m-2

102

100

10-2 2011

Figure 6. Monthly horizontal flux (a) and total vegetation mass (b, in logarithmic scale) for No Man, Mean HarvRes, and Ref scenarios in 2011 and 2012. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com] Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, (2017)

AGROPASTORAL MANAGEMENT IMPACT ON WIND EROSION IN SAHELIAN CROPLANDS

1800

Annual Horizontal Flux (kg.m-1)

1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200

7 (2 .7E 00 5 8)

7. (2 2E 00 5 7)

6. (2 7E 00 5 6)

6 (2 .0E 01 5 0)

4 (2 .9E 00 5 9)

3 (2 .8E 01 5 4 1) (2 .0E 01 5 2)

0

Cumulated DUP (m3.s-3) 1

3

3

Figure 7. Boxplot of annual wind erosion (in kg m ) versus the annually cumulated dust uplift potential (in m s ) and the corresponding year for all scenarios.

previous years) and Late FClear scenarios. TotHarvRes and MaxGraze scenarios account for the high outliers in Figure 7. Between these extreme values, simulated horizontal fluxes for all other scenarios range each year in similar relative order (not shown). The annual simulated horizontal fluxes for each scenario correlate well with DUP (R = 0·75 to 0·97; Table III), with the highest correlation occurring when the soil becomes bare

soon after harvest (Tot HarvRes and Max Graze) and the lowest correlation occurring when scenarios result in the most protected surfaces (No Graze and LongC Mil). The main impact of rainfall on wind erosion operates through dry vegetation during the late dry season and beginning of the next rainy season (i.e., dry stalks and litter from the previous vegetation cycle, while the new green vegetation mass is still very low) because most wind erosion

Table III. Correlation coefficient of the annual horizontal fluxes with the annual dust uplift potentials (R DUP) – a proxy for potential wind erosion – with vegetation maximum mass of the previous year (R veg max y1) and associated p-values and standard deviation (in kg m1) of the annual horizontal fluxes due to climate factors (among years) and their coefficient of variation (CV = SD/mean) over 2006–2012, for all scenarios n R DUP p-value R veg max y1 p-value std over years CV over years

No Graze

Late FClear

Mean FClear

LongC Mil

Max Dens

Max Man

Mean Dens

Ref

Early Sow

0·75 0·0518 0·94 0·0058

0·95 0·0009 0·78 0·0688

0·97 0·0002 0·70 0·1201

0·82 0·0242 0.10 0·8459

0·89 0·0072 0·53 0·2787

0·93 0·0028 0·57 0·2339

0·92 0·0033 0·58 0·2272

0·94 0·0015 0·64 0·1728

0·94 0·0014 0·65 0·1598

7

178

348

376

292

381

392

399

427

434

7

1·47

0·73

0·59

0·56

0·57

0·56

0·54

0·54

Late Sow

Mean LayRes

Mean HarvRes

No Man

Sorghum

ShortC Mil

Tot LayRes

Max Graze

Tot HarvRes

0·97 0·0004 0·39 0·4445

0·94 0·0016 0·65 0·1611

0·94 0·0017

0·94 0·0016 0·69 0·1321

0·92 0·0029 0·58 0·2280

0·83 0·0222 0·69 0·1327

0·97 0·0004 0·75 0·0886

0·97 0·0004

0·97 0.0003

7

337

435

440

468

468

458

440

418

414

7

0·41

0.50

0·51

0·49

0·46

0·43

7 6

n R DUP p-value R veg max y1 p-value std over years CV over years

Scenario name

7 6

Scenario name

Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

0·49

0·43

0·32

0·31

LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, (2017)

C. PIERRE ET AL.

occurs during this period of the year when total vegetation amounts are low and large wind speeds are frequent. Thus, wind erosion depends on the previous vegetation maximum, which depends on the rainfall amount and distribution during the previous rainy season (e.g., Kergoat et al., 2017). Annual horizontal fluxes are anticorrelated (although correlation coefficients are often not significant at the 0·10 level) with the vegetation maximum mass of the previous year for most scenarios (R = 0·39 to 0·94, except for LongC Mil). This analysis does not include scenarios in which crop residues are collected or removed (Tot HarvRes, Mean HarvRes, and Max Graze) because the interannual linkage operating through crop residue is broken in these scenarios. The strongest interannual anticorrelation is obtained for the No Graze scenario, which exhibits the greatest amounts of crop residue during the dry season. The coefficient of variation (CV) of annual horizontal flux due to climate factors (i.e., computed among all years, successively for each scenario) ranges between 0·31 (Tot HarvRes) and 1·47 (No Graze; Table III), which correspond, respectively, to the highest and lowest mean annual horizontal fluxes (Figure 2). Besides No Graze, standard deviations are relatively constant across scenarios (~300 to 450 kg m1), and therefore, decreasing CV is the result of increasing total horizontal fluxes. Thus, the more agropastoral practices favor horizontal flux, the lower the relative variability induced by climate factors. Additionally, the variability due to climate factors for the Ref scenario induces annual horizontal fluxes ranging from 270 kg m1 in 2012 to 1,280 kg m1 in 2006. This compares to the difference between mean annual fluxes among scenarios, that is, due to practices, which range from 120 kg m1 for No Graze to 1,300 kg m1 for Tot HarvRes. Yields and Crop Residue Amounts In actual fields, Sahelian farmers make decisions on cropping practices by considering, among other things, potential crop yields and livestock production, which utilizes crop residue. In the simulations, most scenarios provide similar grain yields of about 1,000 kg ha1 (not shown), in reasonable agreement with observations from Rockström et al. (2002) for sorghum in Burkina Faso for similar rainfall conditions in 1998–2000 (300 to 1,500 kg ha1) and from Marteau et al. (2011) for millet fields around Niamey in 2004–2009 (400 to 1,000 kg ha1). Some field surveys, however, suggest lower plant productivity and crop yields, including Rockström & de Rouw (1997) who observed millet yields of about 500 kg ha1 for traditional fields in Banizoumbou in 1994–1996. This implies that the present simulations are closer to well-maintained crops in fertile soils. Furthermore, simulated yields may be overestimated because the model does not take into account factors like pests, diseases, granivory, and competition with weeds. Short cycle millet (ShortC Mil) results in the greatest crop yields, although with the highest interannual variability. The ShortC Mil scenario also has lower residue present on the following 1 November compared with the other millet Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

varieties, thus favoring wind erosion. Overall, most scenarios yield crop residue on 1 November greater than the 800 kg ha1 suggested by Abdourhamane Touré et al. (2011) as sufficient to prevent wind erosion. The large values for residue on 1 November are in agreement with the values of 1,000 to 2,500 kg ha1 observed by Schlecht et al. (2001) in western Niger in October. Thus, given the meteorological conditions of the study site, there are several scenarios that could be chosen by farmers to produce yields and significant crop residue after harvest. Scenarios Limitations This study addresses the impact of different managements individually, meaning that all factors have been considered independently. Although this is useful in identifying the most important variables and the most critical periods for wind erosion, it ignores the complexity of management practices at the landscape scale. Actual land management decisions in Sahelian croplands may combine several of the practices tested here. For example, high grazing pressure would be associated with considerable amounts of manure, increasing soil fertility and potentially large sowing density (Schlecht et al., 2004). Moreover, grazing pressure is likely to decrease as vegetation mass decreases because livestock will move to places with more forage. Farmers choose the sowing date and the plant variety depending on the beginning of the rainy season, and they further adjust the sowing density to soil fertility (Marteau et al., 2011). For the study site, short cycle and long cycle millet are probably not the best adapted cultivars, although they could be selected for specific situations (Roudier et al., 2016). In addition, two different plants can be intercropped in the same field (e.g., millet and cowpeas; Schlecht & Buerkert, 2004). However, cowpeas usually start growing later than reference millet (Saidou et al., 2010), so neglecting intercropping in the simulations is not likely to influence the conclusions presented here. Beyond the practices examined here, Sahelian farmers also work under other constrains, like the availability of labor during the year, the proximity of fields, and demands related to both cropping and livestock farming. CONCLUSION The impact of Sahelian agropastoral practices on winddriven soil erosion has been explored combining a model simulating crop growth and one computing wind erosion. In that purpose, we have tested the coupling of these models in 18 scenarios applied to a site in western Niger where measures had been carried out allowing an evaluation of the simulations. The simulated horizontal fluxes vary by a factor of 10 among the scenarios, with values that are generally consistent with the literature. Previous studies focused on the effects of crop residues on wind erosion; the present work confirms that crop residue management exerts a greater control on aeolian fluxes than cropping practices during the growing season. Grazing might have mixed impacts, LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, (2017)

AGROPASTORAL MANAGEMENT IMPACT ON WIND EROSION IN SAHELIAN CROPLANDS

probably mediated by livestock mobility. Importantly, our simulations show that agropastoral practices do influence the seasonality of wind erosion and that annual horizontal fluxes are closely correlated to meteorological conditions such as wind speed and previous year rainfall. At this stage, combined modeling of crop growth (including residues during the dry season) and wind erosion is in its infancy, and the results presented here are from simple scenarios. Studies on the impacts of agropastoral practices on wind erosion in the Sahel are few, and our results need to be tested, for example, with dedicated field experiments to monitor grazing pressure and the subsequent horizontal fluxes. Thus, rather than being intended to provide recommendations to famers, this study aims at filling a gap in the existing literature on the effects of agropastoral practices on Sahelian wind erosion, particularly through a methodological progress in coupled modeling. However, in the case of southwestern Niger, the amount of crop residues in late dry season appears to be an important control on wind erosion: scenarios that affected this, such as field clearing at the end the dry season, residue collection, and grazing contribute to wind erosion risks according to the model simulations. This suggests that a widespread and increasing collection of crop residues in the Sahel during the coming decades might significantly increase wind erosion in this region.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work has been supported by the research program CAVIARS (ANR-12-SENV-0007-01) from the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche. The authors also thank all members of the CAVIARS project for their useful comments. G. Okin has been an invited scientist supported by the Paris Est University in June 2015 and 2016.

REFERENCES Abdourhamane Touré A, Rajot JL, Garba Z, Marticorena B, Petit C, Sebag D. 2011. Impact of very low crop residues cover on wind erosion in the Sahel. Catena 85: 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. catena.2011.01.002. Akponikpe PBI, Gerard B, Bielders CL. 2014. Soil water crop modeling for decision support in millet-based systems in the Sahel: a challenge. African Journal of Agricultural Research 9: 1,700–1,713. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.agsy.2014.08.012. Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M. 1998. Crop evapotranspiration— guidelines for computing crop water requirements—FAO irrigation and drainage paper 56. FAO Rome 300 D05109. Andrieu N, Vayssieres J, Corbeels M, Blanchard M, Vall E, Tittonell P. 2015. From farm scale synergies to village scale trade-offs: cereal crop residues use in an agro-pastoral system of the Sudanian zone of Burkina Faso. Agricultural Systems 134: 84–96. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.agsy.2014.08.012. Aubault H, Webb NP, Strong CL, McTainsh GH, Leys JF, Scanlan JC. 2015. Grazing impacts on the susceptibility of rangelands to wind erosion: the effects of stocking rate, stocking strategy and land condition. Aeolian Research 17: 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2014.12.005. Baddock MC, Zobeck TM, Van Pelt RS, Fredrickson EL. 2011. Dust emissions from undisturbed and disturbed, crusted playa surfaces: cattle Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

trampling effects. Aeolian Research. 3: 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. aeolia.2011.03.007. Baron C, Sultan B, Balme M, Sarr B, Traoré SB. 2005. From GCM grid cell to agricultural plot: scale issues affecting modelling of climate impact. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 360: 2,095–2,108. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1741. Bergametti G, Rajot JL, Pierre C, Bouet C, Marticorena B. 2016. How long does precipitation inhibit wind erosion in the Sahel? Geophysical Research Letters 43: 6,643–6,649. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069324. Bezançon G, Pham JL, Deu M, Vigouroux Y, Sagnard F, Mariac C, Kapran I, Mamadou A, Gerard B, Ndjeunga J, Chantereau J. 2009. Changes in the diversity and geographic distribution of cultivated millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) varieties in Niger between 1976 and 2003. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 56: 223–236 DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722008-9357-3. Bielders CL, Rajot JL, Amadou M. 2002. Transport of soil and nutrients by wind in bush fallow land and traditionally managed cultivated fields in the Sahel. Geoderma 109: 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S00167061(02)00138-6. Bielders CL, Rajot JL, Michels K. 2004. L’érosion éolienne dans le Sahel nigérien: influence des pratiques culturales actuelles et méthodes de lutte. Sécheresse 15: 19–32. Breman H, Groot JJR, van Keulen H. 2001. Resource limitations in Sahelian agriculture. Global Environmental Change 11: 59–68. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0959-3780(00)00045-5. Buerkert A, Bationo A, Piepho HP. 2001. Efficient phosphorus application strategies for increased crop production in sub-Saharan West Africa. Field Crops Research 72: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(01)00166-6. Buerkert A, Lamers JP, Schmelzer GH, Becker K, Marschner H. 1997. Phosphorus and millet crop residue application affect the quantity and quality of millet leaves and fodder weeds for ruminants in agro-pastoral systems of the Sahel. Expl Agric 33: 253–263. CILSS (Comité Permanent Inter-états de Lutte contre la Sécheresse dans le Sahel). 2016. Landscapes of West Africa — a window on a changing world: Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso, 219 p. https://doi.org/10.5066/F7N014QZ Darmenova K, Sokolik IN, Shao Y, Marticorena B, Bergametti G. 2009. Development of a physically based dust emission module within the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model: assessment of dust emission parameterizations and input parameters for source regions in Central and East Asia. Journal of Geophysical Research 114. https:// doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011236. de Ridder N, Breman H, van Keulen H, Stomph TJ. 2004. Revisiting a ‘cure against land hunger’: soil fertility management and farming systems dynamics in the West African Sahel. Agricultural Systems 80: 109–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2003.06.004. Dingkuhn M, Baron C, Bonnal V, Maraux F, Sarr B. 2003. Decision support tools for rainfed crops in the Sahel at the plot and regional scales. In A practical guide to decision-support tools for agricultural productivity and soil fertility enhancement in sub-Saharan Africa, IFDC, CTA, International Fertilizer Development Center, Muscle Shoals, StruifBontkes TE, Wopereis MCS (eds): AL, USA; 127–139. Drees LR, Manu A, Wilding LP. 1993. Characteristics of aeolian dusts in Niger, West Africa. Geoderma 59: 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0016-7061(93)90070-2. Fister W, Ries JB. 2009. Wind erosion in the central Ebro Basin under changing land use management. Field experiments with a portable wind tunnel. Journal of Arid Environments 73: 996–1,004. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2009.05.006. Gomes L, Rajot JL, Alfaro SC, Gaudichet A. 2003. Validation of a dust production model from measurements performed in Spain and Niger. Catena 52: 257–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0341-8162(03)00017-1. Hiernaux P, Turner MD. 2002. The influence of farmer and pastoralist management practices on desertification processes in the Sahel. Global desertification: Do humans cause deserts : 135–148. Houyou Z, Bielders CL, Benhorma HA, Dellal A, Boutemdjet A. 2016. Evidence of strong land degradation by wind erosion as a result of rainfed cropping in the Algerian steppe: a case study at Laghouat. Land Degradation & Development 27: 1,788–1,796. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2295. Ikazaki K, Shinjo H, Tanaka U, Tobita S, Funakawa S, Kosaki T. 2011. “Fallow Band System,” a land management practice for controlling desertification and improving crop production in the Sahel, West Africa. 1. Effectiveness in desertification control and soil fertility improvement. Soil science and plant nutrition 57: 573–586. https://doi. org/10.1080/00380768.2011.593155.

LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, (2017)

C. PIERRE ET AL. Kergoat L, Guichard F, Pierre C, Vassal C. 2017. Influence of dry-season vegetation variability on Sahelian dust during 2002–2015. Geophysical Research Letters 44: 5,231–5,239. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL072317. Kouressy M, Dingkuhn M, Vaksmann M, Heinemann AB. 2008. Adaptation to diverse semi-arid environments of sorghum genotypes having different plant type and sensitivity to photoperiod. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 148: 357–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.09.009. Lal R. 1994. Soil erosion by wind and water: problems and prospects. Soil erosion: Research methods 2: 1–9. Laurent B, Marticorena B, Bergametti G, Léon JF, Mahowald NM. 2008. Modeling mineral dust emissions from the Sahara desert using new surface properties and soil database. Journal of Geophysical Research 113 D14218. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009484. Lebel T, Ali A. 2009. Recent trends in the central and western Sahel rainfall regime (1990–2007). Journal of Hydrology 375: 52–64. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.11.030. Marsham JH, Knippertz P, Dixon NS, Parker DJ, Lister G. 2011. The importance of the representation of deep convection for modeled dust-generating winds over West Africa during summer. Geophysical Research Letters : 38. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048368. Marteau R, Sultan B, Moron V, Alhassane A, Baron C. 2011. The onset of the rainy season and farmers’ sowing strategy for pearl millet cultivation in Southwest Niger. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 151: 1,356–1,369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.05.018. Marticorena B, Bergametti G. 1995. Modeling the atmospheric dust cycle: 1. Design of a soil derived dust production scheme. Journal of Geophysical Research 100: 16,415–16,430. https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD00690. Marticorena B, Chatenet B, Rajot JL, Bergametti G, Deroubaix A, Vincent J, Kouoi A, Schmechtig C, Coulibaly M, Diallo A, Koné I, Maman A, NDiaye T, Zakou A. 2016. Mineral dust over west and central Sahel: seasonal patterns of dry and wet deposition fluxes from a pluriannual sampling (2006–2012). Journal of Geophysical Research. . https://doi.org/ 10.1002/2016JD025995. McTainsh GH, Leys JF, O’Loingsigh T, Strong CL. 2011. Wind erosion and land management in Australia during 1940–1949 and 2000–2009. Report prepared for the Australian Government Department of Sustainability, environment, water, population and communities on behalf of the State of the Environment 2011 Committee, 45. Canberra: DSEWPaC. Mendez MJ, Buschiazzo DE. 2010. Wind erosion risk in agricultural soils under different tillage systems in the semiarid Pampas of Argentina. Soil and Tillage Research 106: 311–316. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.still.2009.10.010. Michels K, Sivakumar MVK, Allison BE. 1995. Wind erosion control using crop residue I. Effects on soil flux and soil properties. Field Crops Research 40: 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(94)00094-S. Moulin C, Chiapello I. 2006. Impact of human-induced desertification on the intensification of Sahel dust emission and export over the last decades. Geophysical Research Letters. 33. https://doi.org/10.1029/ 2006GL025923. Nordstrom KF, Hotta S. 2004. Wind erosion from cropland in the USA: a review of problems, solutions and prospects. Geoderma 121: 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2003.11.012z. Pierre C, Bergametti G, Marticorena B, Abdourhamane Touré A, Rajot JL, Kergoat L. 2014. Modeling wind erosion flux and its seasonality from a cultivated Sahelian surface: a case study in Niger. Catena 122: 61–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2014.06.006. Pierre C, Bergametti G, Marticorena B, Kergoat L, Mougin E, Hiernaux P. 2014. Description of a heterogeneous vegetation cover and its drag partition for the estimation of dust emission. Journal of Geophysical Research 119: 2,291–2,313. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JF003177. Pierre C, Bergametti G, Marticorena B, Mougin E, Bouet C, Schmechtig C. 2012. Impact of vegetation and soil moisture seasonal dynamics on dust emissions over the Sahel. Journal of Geophysical Research 117. https:// doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016950. Pierre C, Kergoat L, Bergametti G, Mougin E, Baron C, Grippa M, Marticorena B, Diawara M. 2015. Modelling vegetation and wind erosion from a millet field and from a rangeland: two Sahelian case studies. Aeolian Research 19: 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2015.09.009. Rajot JL. 2001. Wind blown sediment mass budget of Sahelian village land units in Niger. Bulletin de la Société Geologique Française 172: 523–531. https://doi.org/10.2113/172.5.523. Rasmussen LV, Reenberg A. 2015. Multiple outcomes of cultivation in the Sahel: a call for a multifunctional view of farmers’ incentives. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 13: 1–22. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/14735903.2013.826048.

Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Riksen MJ, Visser SM. 2008. Predicting the effect of tilling practices on wind erosion activity: application of the Wind Erosion Prediction System in a sand drift area in The Netherlands. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 33: 1,864–1,874. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1732. Rockström J, Barron J, Fox P. 2002. Rainwater management for increased productivity among small-holder farmers in drought prone environments. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 27: 949–959. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S1474-7065(02)00098-0. Rockström J, de Rouw A. 1997. Water, nutrients and slope position in onfarm pearl millet cultivation in the Sahel. Plant and Soil 195: 311–327. Roehrig R, Bouniol D, Guichard F, Hourdin F, Redelsperger JL. 2013. The present and future of the West African monsoon: a process-oriented assessment of CMIP5 simulations along the AMMA transect. Journal of Climate 26: 6,471–6,505. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00505.1. Roudier P, Alhassane A, Baron C, Louvet S, Sultan B. 2016. Assessing the benefits of weather and seasonal forecasts to millet growers in Niger. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 223: 168–180. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.04.010. Saidou AK, Omae H, Tobita S. 2010. Combination effect of crop design and crop densities in the system of millet/cowpea rotation in the Sahel, West Africa. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Science 7: 644–647. Schlecht E, Buerkert A. 2004. Organic inputs and farmers’ management strategies in millet fields of western Niger. Geoderma 121: 271–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2003.11.015. Schlecht E, Hiernaux P, Achard F, Turner MD. 2004. Livestock related nutrient budgets within village territories in western Niger. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 68: 199–211. Schlecht E, Kadaouré I, Graef I, Hülsebusch C, Mahler F, Becker K. 2001. Land-use and agricultural practices in the agro-pastoral farming systems of western Niger — a case study. Die Erde 132: 399–418. Sharratt B, Wendling F, Feng G. 2012. Surface characteristics of a windblown soil altered by tillage intensity during summer fallow. Aeolian Research. 5: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeolia.2012.02.002. Sterk G. 2003. Causes, consequences and control of wind erosion in Sahelian Africa: a review. Land Degradation & Development 14: 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.526. Sylla MB, Elguindi N, Giorgi F, Wisser D. 2015. Projected robust shift of climate zones over West Africa in response to anthropogenic climate change for the late 21st century. Climate Change : 1–13. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10584-015-1522-z. Traoré SB, Alhassane A, Muller B, Kouressy M, Somé L. 2011. Characterizing and modeling the diversity of cropping situations under climatic constraints in West Africa. Atmospheric Science Letters 12: 89–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.295. United Nation, 2015. World population prospects—the 2015 revision. New York, 2015. Valbuena D, Tui SHK, Erenstein O, Teufel N, Duncan A, Abdoulaye T, Swain B, Mekonnen K, Germaine I, Gerard B. 2015. Identifying determinants, pressures and trade-offs of crop residue use in mixed smallholder farms in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. Agricultural Systems 134: 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2014.05.013. van Vliet N, Reenberg A, Rasmussen LV. 2013. Scientific documentation of crop land changes in the Sahel: a half empty box of knowledge to support policy? Journal of Arid Environments 95: 1–13. https://doi.org/1 0.1016/j.jaridenv.2013.03.010. Webb NP, Herrick JE, Duniway MC. 2014. Ecological site-based assessments of wind and water erosion: informing accelerated soil erosion management in rangelands. Ecological Applications 24: 1,405–1,420. https://doi.org/10.1890/13-1175.1.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION Additional Supporting Information may be found online in the supporting information tab for this article. Figure S1: Scheme of the coupling between the two models: SarraH for crop growth and DPM for wind erosion (LAI, leaf area index; BM, vegetation mass; fcv, fractional cover; z0, surface aerodynamic roughness). S1: Crop growth modelling. S2: Wind erosion modelling. LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, (2017)