Turkey Economic and Institutional Issues - Gunes Kamber's webpage

Mar 14, 2007 - Due to high tax burden, vicious circle. • Lower tax base. • Unfair competition. • Prevents innovation and FDI. • Share of major taxes in total ...
178KB taille 1 téléchargements 201 vues
Turkey Economic and Institutional Issues Gunes Kamber 14/03/2007

Plan of the Lecture 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

Main characteristics of Turkish economy The 2000 IMF programme 2001 economic crisis Aftermath of the crisis Future challenges in the road to the EU

Basic Facts on Turkey • 17th biggest economy in the world (GDP) • GPD per capita : 8900$, upper middle income country • Candidate to European Union • 1990's, lost decade • Average growth rate 1990-2001: 2.4%

Boom Bust Cycles GDP Growth

10,0 9,0 8,0 7,0 6,0 5,0 4,0 3,0 2,0 1,0 0,0 -1,0 -2,0 -3,0 -4,0 -5,0 -6,0 -7,0 -8,0 1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

Political Instability and Public Deficits-1 • 10 governments between 1989 and 1999, dominated by coalitions • Political Business Cycles • Populist policies by subventions to farmers and small enterprises • Resulting in high public deficits and public debt

Political Instability and Public Deficits-2 Public Deficit 0 1988

-5

-10

-15

-20

-25

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

Political Instability and Public Deficits-3 Public Debt TO GDP Ratio 120

100

80

60

40

20

0 1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

Composition of the Public Debt

High and Volatile Inflation Inflation 110

100

90

80

70

60

50

40 1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

Money growth and Inflation

Dollarization • The ratio of foreign exchange deposit to total deposit 25% in 1990, 45% in 2000. • As a result of decreasing confidence to national currency • Dollarization – Decreases the efficiency of domestic politics – Makes the country vulnerable to external shocks

Exchange rate depreciation (US$/TL) 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

Chronic Current Account Deficits 3,0 2,0 1,0 0,0 -1,0 -2,0 -3,0 -4,0 -5,0 -6,0 1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

Fragile Banking Sector • High Concentration, 7 banks hold 75% of the total deposits • Highly national, only 5% of capital hold by foreign investors • Crowding-out of public debt, 40% of assets in Public securities • Exchange rate risks

The Effects on growth • • • •

Investment volatility Crowding out of private investment Inflation uncertainty Current account deficit

Investment Volatility 50,0 40,0 30,0 20,0 10,0 0,0 -10,0 -20,0 -30,0

19 88 19 89 19 90 19 91 19 92 19 93 19 94 19 95 19 96 19 97 19 98 19 99 20 00 20 01 20 02 20 03 20 04

-40,0

Investment growth

GDP growth

High real interest rates

IMF Programme 

The situation in 1999 – Earthquake – Interest rate increased to 100% – Good relationship with EU

• It covers three years • The programme had two main objectives – Bringing inflation to single digits in 3 years, 25%, 12 % and 7% – Ensuring the sustainability of Public Debt

IMF Programme • Instruments – Pre-announced exchange rate 1$+0.77 euros, announced to depreciate 25 %, money supply determinated by foreign capital inflows, fixed central bank assets – Primary surplus of 3.5% of GDP, with accrued fiscal discipline and taxes – Privatizations and Structural Reforms, Social Security, Telecommunications ,Energy

Government Budget Constraint

Government Budget Constraint

• • • • •

Primary surplus Interest payments (Domestic and Foreign) Increase in Debt Monetization Privatization revenues

Macroeconomic Developments in 2000 • Inflation came down to 35% at the end of 2000 • Nominal interest rates decreased to 40% • Strong growth in investment and consumption (especially in durable goods) • Current account deficit to GDP: -4,9%

2001 crisis • • • • •

Why? Real exchange rate appreciation Typical problem with IMF program Coalition problems, reform fatigue First wave in November and the crisis in February 2001

2001 crisis • 19 February, a political tension • Massive capital escape in one day, 7.5 billion $ which corresponds to 1/3 of Central Bank reserves • Overnight Interest rates increased to 6200% • Central Bank abandoned the fixed exchange rate, huge depreciation, 40% in one day • Debt to GNP ratio increased to 90% • Result: Inflation 70% • Decrease in GDP : -9,1%

Aftermath of the crisis • Quick recovery, External support, new IMF program, with same principles except for the exchange rate regimes and primary surplus of 6.5% of GDP • Vice-president of the World Bank assigned as the minister of Economics with extreme powers, unique voice of the economic administration • November 2002, first time in 20 years a unique party had the majority in the parliament

Growth and Inflation since 2002 2002 2003 2004

2005

2006

Growth

7,9

5,8

8,9

7,4

5,7*

Inflation

29,7

18,4

9,3

7,72

9,65

Debt/GDP

78,5

70,4

63,9

55,3

Serious candidate the EU since 2004 • Why this is so important? • For Europe – big country, a new large and dynamic market – Can help smooth transition with ageing problem – But Turkey is relatively poor, absorption problem

• For Turkey • Challenges waiting Turkey beside political problems

Official Convergence Criteria • Inflation, no more than 1.5% point higher than 3 lowest inflation rates • Deficit and Public Debt ( -3% and 60%of GDP) • Exchange rate stability • Long term interest rates stability • Current difficulties with inflation targeting

Determinants of long run growth • Y=F(K,L,A) • K : Capital – Investment – FDI

• L : Labor Force – Employment

• A : Total Factor Productivity

FDI

Labor Market

Labor Market • Participation Ratio – Female Participation – Discouraged Unemployed

• Agriculture – Almost 35% of the employment but only 15% of GDP – Disguised unemployment – Recent reforms from price support to income support

Informal sector • • • • •

Due to high tax burden, vicious circle Lower tax base Unfair competition Prevents innovation and FDI Share of major taxes in total revenues

Education • Exports based on low cost is not sustainable in the long run • Unequal education opportunities