Proust's Aesthetic of Reading

power and an answer, a partial an partie, avait commenc. Proust believed that literature's .... left nothing to the imagination, nothing to the reader's own powers of.
2MB taille 6 téléchargements 518 vues
Proust's Aesthetic of Reading Author(s): Robert Soucy Source: The French Review, Vol. 41, No. 1 (Oct., 1967), pp. 48-59 Published by: American Association of Teachers of French Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/384504 Accessed: 04-09-2017 22:15 UTC REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: http://www.jstor.org/stable/384504?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms

American Association of Teachers of French is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The French Review

This content downloaded from 131.247.112.3 on Mon, 04 Sep 2017 22:15:03 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

Proust's Aesthetic of Reading by Robert Soucy

THE NARRATOR IN PROUST'S A LA RECHERCHE DU

TEMPS PERD U, after a long pilgrimage through life in which society, conversation, love and friendship all leave him disillusioned, eventually realizes that his salvation lies in literary creation. But what of the nonartist? What of the reader? What does Proust provide for him? A very great deal, it so happens. In fact, implicit in Proust's works as a whole, in such writings as Contre Sainte-Beuve, Jean Santeuil, Les Plaisirs et les jours and his Ruskin prefaces, as well as in A la recherche du temps perdu, there is a complete aesthetic of reading, one that forms an integral part of Proust's attitude toward art in general.

Reading not only played an important role in Proust's own life, of course, but it played a significant role in the lives of a great many of his fictional creatures also-so much so that Proust often gives us glimpses into their essential natures through their response to books, often characterizes them by their approaches to literature, approaches which are often illustrations of poor kinds of reading. There are all sorts of "bad" readers in Proust's works. There is Frangoise's young footman in A la recherche du temps perdu who reads books from the narrator's library for their snob value, filling his letters to his native village with references to famous authors to impress the folks back home. Or there is Monsieur de Norpois, the "busy" reader, who maintains that the increasing complexity of life and world problems "laisse A peine le temps de lire" and prevents him from bothering with authors who indulge in "toutes ces chinoiseries de forme, toutes ces subtilit6s de mandarin." 1 Or there is Saint-Loup who adheres to the "best" aesthetic formulas and who judges works by their appeal to the intellect exclusively instead of by their appeal to the imagination. There is also the Duchesse de Guermantes who exercises her "wit"

by denigrating works which have become classics and by extravagantly praising lesser-known works in her desire to express "novel," titillating 1 A la recherche du temps perdu (Paris: Gallimard, 1954), Pldiade edition, I, pp. 473, 474. Subsequent references will be indicated in parentheses immediately following the quoted material as La Recherche. 48

This content downloaded from 131.247.112.3 on Mon, 04 Sep 2017 22:15:03 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

PROUST

49

literary faith.

ju

Or,

if

literature a casino and misses as th On the oth reading is a Both Jean often comp For them b Sundays wh very web a newspapers "tandis que y a des cho Proust felt if they pro Holy Writ. tended to s that

books

further

c

for

existence

go

minds, min of the will. his resource a new adren however, a theme of so Indeed, in h as "an impu

very

cente

alone is It must

not be

Bergotte

b

read. Conve a "lazy min ...

j'ftais

quelque

inc

lec

2 "Ruskin an (Garden City

Sesame.

This content downloaded from 131.247.112.3 on Mon, 04 Sep 2017 22:15:03 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

50

FRENCH

attention

REVIEW

4

des

chose

ite presentee dans la mort pour retrouve peindre (La Recherc Why

is

the

narrator

Whence the power a an answer, a partial partie, avait comme

Proust

believed

literature's most vital functions. It is no coincidence that in Contre Sainte-

th

Beuve he called attention to the dream-like quality of G6rard de Nerval's work, adding that even so, "Peut-6tre y-a-t-il encore un peu trop d'intelligence dans sa nouvelle." 3 The child at Combray with his copy of Frangois le Champi is a reader with imagination as well as intelligence, a reader who

dreams. The narrator recalls: ". . dans ce temps-1h, quand je lisais, je revassais souvent pendant des pages entibres a tout autre chose" (La Recherche, I, 42). There is no glorification of speed-reading in Proust; for one thing, it would allow no time for day-dreaming. Proust pointed out repeatedly in his writings that good reading is often a

highly subjective act. There are many times when the good reader is completely impervious to objective standards of aesthetic value when he approaches a book. "What matters, what sets him dreaming is the fact of his admiration, even when it may be given to what is unworthy." 4 The reading in hand need not be a masterpiece to inspire fruitful reveries, indeed it need not even be a book-especially when one is young: A partir d'un certain dge nos souvenirs sont tellement entre-croises les uns sur les autres que la chose d laquelle on pense, le livre qu'on lit n'a presque plus d'importance. On a mis de soi-meme partout, tout est ftcond, tout est dangereux, et on peut faire d'aussi pricieuses decouveries que dans les Pensees

de Pascal dans une reclame pour un savon (La Recherche, III, 543). The Surrealists were not the first to teach that there is often a "marvelous"

side to the most commonplace objects. Proust was well aware also that different persons, that is, different subjectivities, might respond quite differently to the same stimuli, depending on the associations it aroused, or failed to arouse. Just as the smell of gasoline might be unpleasant to one individual while intoxicating another with memories of past voyages, so a particular book might leave I Contre Sainte-Beuve (Paris, 1954), p. 169.

4 Quoted in Walter Strauss, Proust and Literature (Cambridge, Mass., 1957), pp. 212-213. Subsequent references will be indicated as Strauss.

This content downloaded from 131.247.112.3 on Mon, 04 Sep 2017 22:15:03 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

PROUST

51

one intellig could tell. favorite bo and then f toujours qu qui nous ra

nifeste cet Proust is re really know is to say, 'r Proust and from a deep

methodica Yet Proust intensely s response

to

a time, for existence in

instead of t stead of plu from life, Frangoise, copious tear but when s Giotto," th

sadistic

cal

longing to bothering Despite the ways

felt

th

This was o images in w association mediate ins

sequently t prdsente le

d'abord

pa

preceded th to the exp buried 5

Jean

deep

Sante

This content downloaded from 131.247.112.3 on Mon, 04 Sep 2017 22:15:03 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

52

FRENCH

REVIEW

from a sensibility im same held true for th

as

springboards

to

t

madeleine itself. The and abstract. Bergott

this sense:

... pour se separer de la pricidente generation, trop amie des abstractions, des grands lieux communs, quand Bergotte voulait dire du bien d'un livre, ce qu'il faisait valoir, ce qu'il citait c'etait toujours quelque scene faisant image, quelque tableau sans signification rationnelle (La Recherche, I, 55-6).

Proust felt that one of the major drawbacks of the Realistic school of literature was that it severely limited the reader's participation in the work

before him. Instead of making literature a catalyst to the imagination, it left nothing to the imagination, nothing to the reader's own powers of creation. Indeed, its greatest disservice, wrote Proust in Contre SainteBeuve, was that it suppressed the imagination, "la seule chose pr6cieuse." It is a considerable commentary on Proust's views on art that the narrator in La Recherche should reach the nadir of his disillusionment with literature

after reading an unpublished Goncourt journal! The "good" readers in Proust are invariably creative readers who discover analogies in their own lives with experiences described in books. Just as "la petite phrase" in Vinteuil's sonata returns Swann, mentally, a hundred times to the Bois de Boulogne with Odette, a passage or image in a book may return a reader to a moment in his past, or plunge him more

deeply into the present. Indeed, in La Recherche, Proust, with his tendency to draw analogies by three's, seems almost deliberately to be provoking

the reader to add a fourth. As he himself loved to create endless variations

on basic, general human experiences, on what he sometimes called "laws," so the reader, he seems to say, should join him in these perpetual creations and add variations of his own. In fact, at one point in the novel the nar-

rator actually calls upon his readers to acknowledge the Messieurs de Charlus whom they have known in their own lives. He himself notes that, after the death of Albertine, by evoking past impressions of his mistress, " . . . j'en nourrissais l'oeuvre que je lisais" (La Recherche, III, 56). There was nothing wrong with this, as Proust makes clear in Le Temps retrouve, for there are two parts to an impression, the object and ourselves, and all too often we tend to neglect that which is inside ourselves for that which is outside. There are, of course, those "erudites" who do nothing but this, but they "vieillissent inutiles et insatisfaits, comme des c6libataires de

l'Art!" (La Recherche, III, 892).

This content downloaded from 131.247.112.3 on Mon, 04 Sep 2017 22:15:03 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

PROUST

Proust lead to

53

was misr

actually valuable.

me

"Le

he wrote. " son image tous les con

In Le Temps someday mi into what t loved and w sex by a rea stitutions in the book mo literary

as

criti

worthy

a

Bible d'Amiens:

Les grandes beautes litteraires correspondent 4 quelque chose, et c'est peu 'tre l'enthousiasme en art, qui est le criterium de la verite. A supposer q Ruskin ce soit quelquefois trompS, comme critique, dans l'exacte appreciation de la valeur d'une weuvre, la beaute de son jugement errond est souvent plus

interessante que celle de l' wuvre jugge et correspond a quelque chose qui, pou Otre autre qu'elle, n'est pas moins precieux.6

And yet even such "mis-translations" are based on the principle that there is a generality as well as an individuality in human affairs, that there are "general laws" which permit the multitude of different subjec tivities who compose the human race to recognize and share certain unive sal experiences in common. It is the particulars that change, not the gen eralities. Since such experiences are general, and therefore communicabl they are the very stuff of literature. Consequently, when Proust's creatures

find themselves living an experience which they have read about in a boo

they may feel that what they are living is in some way "literary." Contre Sainte-Beuve, Proust tells how a politician with a bad reputatio who makes friends in a place where his reputation is unknown, yet wh realizes these friends will discover the truth someday and turn against him, is consoled by the fact that Balzac's Princesse de Cadignan lived i dread of a similar fate. Hence, ". . . il sait qu'il participe a une situation en quelque sorte litteraire et qui prend par 1l quelque beaut'" (Contr 6 John Ruskin, Bible d'Amiens (Paris, 1926), p. 76.

This content downloaded from 131.247.112.3 on Mon, 04 Sep 2017 22:15:03 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

54

FRENCH

REVIEW

Sainte-Beuve, p. 223 would not have poss On the other hand, erature is not someh echo in his own past Speaking of an artic observes that many understand it and w ognizes the foolishn to

say.

Comme

si

les

idles

et

pour les lire et les fai ce que les miens peuve

qui

en

poss~dent

nat

Thus in La Recherch the death of Lucien courtisanes than a h ments that certain

because

Dostoevski'

sensibility.

En rdalite, chaque le L'ouvrage de l'4criva au

lecteur

'tre

pas

afin

vu

en

de

lui

p

soi-m

Indeed, at times the pletely and think on the

surroundings

that

impressions only in simply a means of r

if the book is a child In fact, one might Proust puts literatur the author's point of

side

to

reading

wh

Proust was very mu temporarily annihil the author, of getti

another. time

in

It

may

order

to

This content downloaded from 131.247.112.3 on Mon, 04 Sep 2017 22:15:03 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

ev

get

PROUST

55

Proust in C ludicrous si completely his

various

w

shameful ab independen

Les personn par les livre independan de la libert6 de

ce

qu'on

(Bible

s

d'Am

One may br regard to R This theme It should n very first p reading, ho came that moi-meme Frangois ler secondes a I, 3). It is s his "reason the world of all good rea to give. What the great artist gives us, according to Proust, is a new pair of eyes, a new consciousness. Thanks to such gifts the world can be perpetually created anew for us. For it is the kind of eyes, the way we see things, that give objects their particular value, not so much the objects themselves.

Thus a hospital can be as beautiful as a cathedral, depending upon the sensibility, the eyes that see it. And it is through art that we best share the different visions of great eyes:

... car le style pour l'ecrivain ... est une question non de technique mais de vision. Il est la revelation, qui serait impossible par des moyens directs et conscients, de la difference qualitative qu'il y a dans la fa on dont nous apparait le monde, difference qui, s'il n'y avait pas l'art, resterait le secret eternel

de chacun. Par l'art seulement nous pouvons sortir de nous, savoir ce que voit un autre de cet univers qui n'est pas le mJme que le ndtre, et dont les paysa-

This content downloaded from 131.247.112.3 on Mon, 04 Sep 2017 22:15:03 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

56

FRENCH

ges

nous

lune.

REVIEW

seraient

Grdce

d

re

l'art,

au

multiplier, et autan mondes 4 notre disp Therefore, new than a

to travel great wo

Le seul veritable voy vers de nouveaux pay les yeux d'un autre, d voit, que chacun d'e Vinteuil, avec leur p cherche, III, 258).

One way an artist pu is through the uniqu own special way of more than simply a s habitual, convention narrator in La Rech types" in the works art can cut through which haste and "pr her how the sharp k through this ersatz re such "phrase-types" remonter a la vie, c' et du raisonnement'q nous ne la voyons ja

Beuve, Habit and

p.

303).

(which

the

Prous

deadening

eff

Proust comes back Recherche is the na struggle

can .*.

to

overcome

defeat

certains

l'habitude,

heures

its

hold

romans

nous

remet

seulement,

co

qu'elles

produisent,

d

contre

lutter

o

elles

This content downloaded from 131.247.112.3 on Mon, 04 Sep 2017 22:15:03 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

l

et

PROUST

presque a

des

57

hyp

effects

Proust belie closely link entering int of

traveling"

into other c they help u grandmothe antique expr dans le tem becoming p from

ing

people

their

ow

Personally

s

room that ha foundly diff where I find thrives becau

p. 190). The same was true with the vision of a great author.

Proust recognized, however, that it was often a difficult transition for the reader to make. The effort it takes to grasp the mind of another, especially when that mind is a great one, is sometimes too much for us. The more original the author, the greater the effort we have to make to transcend

our normal way of looking at things. Used to hackneyed phrases and common metaphors, we find ones that are unique and subtle, difficult to follow

and exhausting-and therefore often displeasing. Consequently, after a first attempt, we may dismiss his work as unsympathetic. In this way, some readers reject what later become their favorite works. This is what happens to Jean Santeuil, for example. He reads Cinna and Phedre at first without pleasure and finds J. J. Weiss preferable to Moliebre. The classical writers of the seventeenth century arouse in him nothing but "un morne ennui" (yet we know that Proust had a deep love for these writers). Jean even rejects at first one of the greatest treasures of his youth,

Le Capitaine Fracasse, having "quelque peine a s'habituer A des descriptions" (Jean Santeuil, I, 123, 177). Just as the narrator in La Recherche finds Vinteuil's sonata disappointing at first, then grasps the "least valuable" parts, and finally the more lasting beauties of the work, so too does

This content downloaded from 131.247.112.3 on Mon, 04 Sep 2017 22:15:03 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

58

FRENCH

REVIEW

Jean only gradually La Recherche the nar value of a work of ar

takes

decades

befor

and appreciate a trul But if the effort is to overcome the me

lenses which prevent h ence what the narrato

cherished moments his favorite author B to

him,

Or

un

the

narrator

nouvel

c

6crivai

entre les choses etaien comprenais presque rie d'arrosage admiraient

sais le long de ces rou de Claudel.' Alors je n ville et qu'il m'?tait d n'Ytait

aller

pas

la

phrase

jusqu'au

bout.

qu

J

pour arriver d l'endro Chaque fois, parvenu d plus

tard

pour zero

&

le

au

pour

6tre

fagon

regiment

nouvel la

ainsi

des

ecriva

gymnastiq

reconnus

occulistes.

L

toujours agreable. Qu regardez. Et voici qu souvent qu'un artiste ferent

de

l'ancien,

mai

sable qui vient d'6tre gique que dechaineron Celui

mais pas

qui

par

avait

la

rempla

nouveaut

l'habitude

de

suivr

indiquait l'identite de sur mille je pouvais voyais .tait toujours ceux

que

j'avais

trouvg

This content downloaded from 131.247.112.3 on Mon, 04 Sep 2017 22:15:03 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

PROUST

Je

59

songeais

monde,

l'avait

pare

appo

Reading, th with each n reads with both, Prous reality

is

a

intellectual not unlike OBERLIN COLLEGE

This content downloaded from 131.247.112.3 on Mon, 04 Sep 2017 22:15:03 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms