Notes on the possibility of embodied computation ... - René Doursat

Aug 4, 2005 - slime mold amoebas. (Brian Goodwin, Schumacher College, UK.) Spiral waves in a model of a dog heart. (James Keener, University of Utah.) ...
693KB taille 5 téléchargements 59 vues
Notes on the possibility of embodied computation based on the emergence of singularities in a large-scale complex dynamical system

René Doursat

Jean Petitot

Brain Computation Laboratory Department of Computer Science University of Nevada, Reno

CREA Ecole Polytechnique, Paris

Embodied . . . computation?

perception continuous physical dynamical “fuzzy” extension

→ → → → → → →

language discrete symbolic logic “crisp” intention γ

α β

¾ How are these transitions possible and how can we model them? August 2005

Embodied computation = singularities in a large-scale dynamical system

2

Embodied . . . computation?

in short: schematization + categorization = drastic reduction of information ¾ The loss of a huge amount of physical / dynamical / morphological details in order to produce a few discrete / symbolic units of knowledge corresponds to schematization and categorization. August 2005

Embodied computation = singularities in a large-scale dynamical system

3

Example: spatial categorization ACROSS IN

ABOVE

¾ The infinite continuum of scenes is mapped by language to only a few spatial grammatical elements. August 2005

Embodied computation = singularities in a large-scale dynamical system

4

Morphological neurodynamics

Proposal: Given a large-scale complex dynamical system, discrete symbolic information emerges in the form of singularities created by pattern formation in the system (and in the dynamic evolution of these singularities). see: Petitot, J. (1995). Morphodynamics and attractor syntax. In T. van Gelder & R. Port (Eds.), Mind as Motion (pp. 227-281). The MIT Press. August 2005

Embodied computation = singularities in a large-scale dynamical system

5

For example: traveling waves Singularities = collision points

(a)

(b)

(c)

“ABOVE”

¾ Under the influence of an external input (a), the internal dynamics of the system (b) spontaneously produces singularities (c), characteristic of a symbolic category. August 2005

Embodied computation = singularities in a large-scale dynamical system

6

Criticality

¾ A network of excitable units construed as a “sensitive plate”: when slightly perturbed by an input, it quickly transitions into an ordered regime whose specific morphology and singularities depend on the input. August 2005

Embodied computation = singularities in a large-scale dynamical system

7

Spiking neural model supporting traveling waves Detailed view

¾ “Grass-fire” wave on 16x16 network of coupled Bonhoeffer-van der Pol units

August 2005

Embodied computation = singularities in a large-scale dynamical system

8

Instead of group synchronization: traveling waves Instead of phase plateaus: phase gradients

ϕ

ϕ

π

π

x -π

-π Wang, D. L. & Terman, D. (1997) Image segmentation based on oscillatory correlation. Neural Computation, 9: 805-836,1997 August 2005

x Doursat, R., & Petitot, J. (2005b) Dynamical models and cognitive linguistics: Toward an active morphodynamical semantics. To appear in Neural Networks (special issue on IJCNN 2005)

Embodied computation = singularities in a large-scale dynamical system

9

Spiking neural model supporting traveling waves Detection of singular points

August 2005

Embodied computation = singularities in a large-scale dynamical system

10

Morphodynamics: summary

¾ input images are boiled down to a few critical features by the complex system’s dynamics ¾ these singularities constitute the characteristic “signature” of the input’s category (e.g., the spatial relationship represented by the image) ¾ key idea: singularities encode a lot of the input’s information in an extremely compact and localized manner August 2005

Embodied computation = singularities in a large-scale dynamical system

11

Morphodynamics: summary

¾ singularities define static schemas ¾ future step: movie-schemas (verbal scenarios) and the composition of schemas could be implemented by the dynamical evolution and composition (bifurcation, interference) of singularities

August 2005

Embodied computation = singularities in a large-scale dynamical system

12

Dynamic evolution of singularities

“OUT OF”

¾ The movie-scenario “out of” is revealed by a bifurcation: the singularity (red) disappears as the ball (black) exits the interior of the box; this is a robust phenomenon largely independent from the shape of the actors. August 2005

Embodied computation = singularities in a large-scale dynamical system

13

Pattern formation

¾ pattern formation is pervasive in physical and biological large-scale systems . . .

August 2005

Embodied computation = singularities in a large-scale dynamical system

14

Spatial (static) pattern formation Spots and stripes

Mammal fur, seashell, and insect wing patterns (Scott Camazine, http://www.scottcamazine.com)

August 2005

Embodied computation = singularities in a large-scale dynamical system

15

Spatiotemporal (dynamic) pattern formation Waves in excitable media

Circular and spiral traveling waves in the Belousov-Zhabotinsky reaction

Wave patterns in aggregating slime mold amoebas

Spiral waves in a model of a dog heart

(Arthur Winfree, University of Arizona.)

(Brian Goodwin, Schumacher College, UK.)

(James Keener, University of Utah.)

August 2005

Embodied computation = singularities in a large-scale dynamical system

16

Spatiotemporal (dynamic) pattern formation Waves in excitable media

Dark front of spreading depression rotating on the retina of a chicken (40-second interval frames) (Gorelova and Bures, 1983)

August 2005

Embodied computation = singularities in a large-scale dynamical system

17

Pattern formation

¾ . . . so why would the brain be fundamentally different? ¾ idea: the brain construed as a spatiotemporal pattern generator, combined with a singularity decoder

August 2005

Embodied computation = singularities in a large-scale dynamical system

18

References

ƒ

Doursat, R., & Petitot, J. (2005a). Bridging the gap between vision and language: A morphodynamical model of spatial categories. IJCNN 2005

ƒ

Doursat, R., & Petitot, J. (2005b). Dynamical models and cognitive linguistics: Toward an active morphodynamical semantics. To appear in Neural Networks (special issue on IJCNN 2005)

August 2005

Embodied computation = singularities in a large-scale dynamical system

19