Myriam Mesbah – 390 mots Who should be called a journalist, then ?

Everybody is ok agrees to say that the access to new media is increasing. Since six years old children are catching caught by this wave of technology so new generations are more and more able to manipulate this . Camera video camera smart phone but also social networks have done our" Flash info breaking news" world in fact citizens should share their experiences and can improvise as journalists. As far as I Know journalist is a real job Being a journalist is not only sharing e information and giving e one's opinions a journalist must have knowledge , have made studies .

Seul ce paragraphe est clair

Theire are only them who are professional. I think that it is after a good report that the no journalist can share the infomation because it will come from reliable source. Non comprehensible

An earthquake and a revolution

Dictatorship it's very hazardous for people who are submissive by this power

A dictatorship is dangerous to the people who are submitted to it.

They live in a perpetual pression of pressure from the authorities .Their there aren't isn’t freedom of speech, of the Press however the world is aware, is informed . Comment ? I think that the problem is not how to spreaed news of from this these countries but we must how to protect them.

On parle de journalisme=> c’est la question

If we don't do nothing anything stories from of their these countries may becoame only a headline for a newspaper , a like in facebook , ...pas clair Sometimes journalism it's only to make money and it's an attractive feature ... Even though Everybody is aware of dramatic tragic situation in the world Nobody Reacts . We can wonder if the mean target of journalism is to unveil Reality and make people react or only make money and let "needy"(by money , by political, knowledge...) people do the rest ...? Crowdsourcing=user-generated content

?? comment cela, personne ne fait rien ??

Je ne comprends pas le concept de needy ici

Hello Everybody . I Share Simon's opinion. "citizen journalism" is not indispensable to do a get good information . it can permits to brought bring more informations and do their testimonies but is not sufficient . I think that citizen journalism denature values of this fascinated/ing job . It is clear that citizens plays an important role in journalism because it do the stories but it must have a real journalist with all purposes .

Goes against the values Because they bring the stories There must be a real journalist Stand up

People can set up for a cause and then somebody (jourlism or historian) will write their demonstrations or something like that . I am very afraid by OF the fact that somebody who haSve not the capacities to do a report so i am never confident by OF this proceed . bye it's very fantastic to speak about this interesting topic.

Points 6

6

3

5

Skill description Content Rich and varied Quite well-informed Repetitive with few ideas Commenting Connected to previous commentaries, qualified , relevant Often connected, qualified and relevant Disconnected, not often qualified or relevant Opinion structures Varied Repetitive Almost none General language Correct + varied structures and vocab. Acceptable, quite varied Incorrect, basic structures and vocabulary

Marking range -

5-6 pts 3-4 pts 1-2 pts

-

5-6 pts

-

3-4 pts

-

1-2 pts

-

3 pts 2 pts 1 pt

-

4-5 pts 2-3 pts 1-2 pts

Will openly support their cause Pas clair

9/20 La langue est trop incorrecte- des points intéressants cependant