Measuring thickness change of glaciers from satellite data: a case

Mean thickness change of Alaskan glaciers as a function of altitude (from. Arendt et al., 2002). 1. Scientifical background. 2. Methodology. 3. Results. 4. Outlooks ...
3MB taille 7 téléchargements 238 vues
'#

(

"

%#

)

*#+ "

# "

to estimate the contribution of glaciers to sea level rise. to improve our knowledge of the regional impact of climate change on glaciers and water ressources But: Only 250 glaciers on earth with mass balance measurements (2% of the total glacierazied area, Braithwaite, 2002)

" !

! " # $%&&%

'#

(

"

%#

)

*#+ "

# "

Field measurements “glaciological method” Time consuming and expensive, harsh environment

Aerial photography “geodetic method” (Funk et al., 1997) Precise but only cover limited area (30 km2)

Airborne laser altimetry (Arendt et al., 2002) Precise, rapid, but expensive and sampling along a few profiles

Aim of this study: to demonstrate that we can use satellite images to derive glacier mass balance. A first step: the measurement of thickness change

'#

(

"

%#

)

*#+ "

# "

Data : - SPOT images - 30 precise GCPs (D-GPS) - DEM computed using PCI geomatica - same GCPs for all images

Validation data : - DEM derived from aerial photographs (same process) - Transverse profile measured each year with GPS on glaciers ),

'#

(

%#

"

)

*#+ "

year #1

# "

year #2

Stereoscopic effect

DEM #1

DEM #2 DEM #2 - DEM #1 differential DEM

Thickness change of glaciers

(

"

%#

)

*#+ "

# "

! Using the fact that, out of the glaciers, no changes are expected ! 6

Planimetric adjustment based on the cross correlation of orthorectified images

Altimetric adjustment based on a polynomial fit to the bias with altitud between the 2 DEM

4 Bias between the two DEM

'#

2 0 -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 700

Before correction After correction 1200

1700

2200

2700

3200

altitude

%&&&

-" %&&*

( .

'#

(

%#

"

)

*#+ "

# "

" 2000

,-

.

/0

Aerial DEM

.

,$ 1 2

Satellite DEM

/,

2003

,0 1 2

GPS profile

.

/$- 1 2

,$ 1 2 GPS profile

Satellite DEM

Ref.

Aerial DEM

Cumulated ablation calculated from a degree day model at 3 different altitudes from the 1st August to the 15th September 2000

%&'(

%

!"# $ ) $$$ *&'+' /

$%&&%

(

Ablation (m we)

4 3,5

2550 m

3

3550 m

2,5

1550 m

2 1,5 1 0,5 0 1/8/00

10/8/00

19/8/00

Time

28/8/00

6/9/00

15/9/00

'#

(

"

%#

)

*#+ "

# "

#

( .

%&&*

%&&&

'0

'#

(

"

%#

*#+ "

)

$

# "

% &'

( ) $'

Accumulation area

!" " %&&&1 Comparison with aerial DEM

'0 $'&

!" " %&&*1

$%#

Out glacier : N = 4734

-= 1.5 m σ = 15.9 m

Out glacier : N = 1549446

-= -0.3 m σ = 6.2 m

On glacier : N = 3190

-= 6.2 m σ=6m

On glacier : N = 806630

-= 1.4 m σ = 2.5 m

'#

(

%#

"

*#+ "

)

# "

*

1994 - 2000

2000 - 2003

5

1600

1700

1800

1900

2000

2100

2200

2300

0 1500

-10

thickness change (m)

thickness change (m)

0 1500 -5

5

-15 -20 -25 -30 -35

GPS profile Satellite DEM

-40

1600

1700

1800

1900

2000

2100

-10 -15

GPS profile Satellite DEM Aerial Photo. DEM

-20

-45

-30 altitude (m.a.s.l.)

altitude (m.a.s.l.)

.

2300

-5

-25

-50

2200

2

2400

'#

(

%#

"

*#+ "

)

# "

" Larger coverage Good resolution

3

3 2

( .

%&&&

%&&*

'#

(

%#

"

)

*#+ "

# "

%' 0

thickness change (m/a)

-1 -2 -3

+

4 2

-4 -5

79-94 94-00

-6

00-03

-7 1500

1800

Altitude (m)

2100

2400

thinning at low altitudes Acceleration of the thinning

'#

(

%#

"

)

*#+ "

# "

" This method is suitable to measure thickness change occuring within a few years (signal over ~5 meters) Acceleration of the melting below 2400m Extend the study to the whole Mont Blanc range (effect of orientation, slope) Production of a new DEM from SPOT5 images during summer 2004 to estimate the annual mass balance With the advent of satellites with submetric resolution (0.7m for PLEIADE), a new way to semi-automatically estimate the annual mass balance of worldwide glaciers.

$

+

Project funded by: ACI-OT Glaciers ISIS program at CNES

Contact: etienne.berthier cnes.fr