Dec 14, 2012 - The proposed changes could have helped the European firms in their efforts to get big internet firms to pay them for passing on their traffic.
A digital cold war? The Economist, December 14, 2012 The internet seems to be an even more divisive than cold-war ideology. The World Conference on International Telecommunications (WCIT) in Dubai, where the ITU met to renegotiate the ITR, ended in failure in the early hours of November 14th. After a majority of countries approved the new treaty, Terry Kramer, the head of the American delegation, announced that his country is “not able to sign the document in its current form.” Shortly thereafter, at least a dozen countries—including Britain, Sweden and Egypt—signalled that they would not support the new treaty either. The main issue was to what extent the internet should feature in the treaty. America and its allies wanted to keep it from being so much as mentioned—mainly out of fear that any reference to it whatsoever would embolden governments to censor the internet and meddle with its infrastructure. For some time a compromise among the more the 600 delegates seemed possible: the binding ITR would indeed hardly make any mention of the internet, but China, Russia and many Arab countries would get a non-binding resolution on the internet (with the awkward title “To foster an enabling environment for the greater growth of the Internet”). America’s willingness to stand up for the internet should be welcomed. But it has to be said that in doing so it is also defended its interests: no other country benefits as much from the status quo in the online world. Since much of the internet’s infrastructure is based in America and most of its traffic zips through it, America is in a unique position to eavesdrop, should it be so inclined. America’s internet firms also capture most of the profit pool of the online industry. Only the host country had a larger delegation than America, which sent more than 120 people to Dubai. The American representatives included officials from the department of defence as well as from internet firms like Facebook and Google. It was not just for fear that it might have a chilling effect on freedom of expression that America did not want the word “security” included in the treaty—it also has a stake in keeping other countries from catching up in such matters. And America’s negotiators were not just worried about a digital divide when they pushed back hard against any attempts by European telecoms operators to introduce language about internet charges. The proposed changes could have helped the European firms in their efforts to get big internet firms to pay them for passing on their traffic. The immediate impact of the WCIT’s failure will be minor. Despite the opposition from America and its allies, the ITU will have the remaining countries sign the new treaty on Friday—in the hope that the other member states will come around eventually. What is more, the treaty may be binding, but a new version will have to be ratified by the ITU’s member states, which can take a couple of years. And it is not clear how it can be enforced. In the medium term, however, the outcome of the conference in Dubai will weaken the ITU— which may not be such a good thing. Among all the controversy it was forgotten that the Script n° 14- langue anglaise 1/2
organisation actually does very useful work, for instance in managing the international radiofrequency spectrum and developing technical standards. And some of the good ideas about which the delegations could agree may now fail to come to fruition. The WCIT reached consensus on a resolution to create a worldwide emergency number (although this would take years to implement). It also agreed on wording to make it easier for landlocked countries and certain island states to get into international fibre-optical networks. The most important result of the conference has been to demonstrate that the world now splits into two camps when it comes to the internet: one is comprised of more authoritarian countries, which would like to turn back the clock and regain sovereignty over their own national bits of the internet; the other wants to keep the internet and its governance as it is (bearing in mind that some of its members’ motives may not always be as pure as they pretend). This sounds much like a digital version of the cold war. The funny thing is that the leading countries in the two camps are the same two that were at loggerheads until the iron curtain parted. One must hope that the failure of the WCIT is not a first step towards raising a digital one.
Oct 30, 2014 - standalone food stores opened this year and it plans about 20 food stores there by 2016. Its Beaugrenelle store a few blocks from the Eiffel ...
Dec 16, 2012 - Our gun culture promotes a fatal slide into extreme individualism. It fosters a society of atomistic individuals, isolated before power â and one ...
theguardian.com, March 10, 2015. The official view: all eyes ... since global warming became a major public issue the advantage in this struggle has begun to.
Jan 26, 2013 - Lancôme advertise the revolutionary potential of micro-particles in ... much higher degree of understanding about the potential health and ...
Meat is bad news. By George Monbiot ... Bred to bulge, scarcely able to move, overfed factory-farmed chickens now ... Farm animals consume one third of.
Feb 6, 2013 - Patrol station, the Golden State Fence Company was well served by the ... freedom of movement in the name of politics, it was rightly chastised ...
Dec 9, 2013 - âImagine I can say to a microphone in the ceiling of the room ' Can you bring ... Pittsburgh Steelers game and play it on a TV in the living room?
stock, is threatened.â Sir Keith had four children but apparently they didn't threaten âour human stockâ. These days, what he said might be less controversial: it's ...
now be constantly connected online), the spread of social media, and the increase in online personal information, are key factors which will interact to influence ...
Dec 10, 2013 - Microsoft and Facebook, will be followed by the petition, which has drawn together a remarkable list of the world's most respected and ...
Dec 19, 2013 - Most governments in Canberra, conservative or Labor, have ... When the Labor government in the 1980s promised "full restitution" and land ...
can scarcely imagine, but it's no more than they deserve: they are, after all, the âjob creators,â the engines of economic growth. The poor, by contrast, are just a ...
Jan 3, 2014 - Page 1. Script n° 02- langue anglaise. 1/2. GRENOBLE ECOLE DE MANAGEMENT. CONCOURS HEC SESSION 2014. EPREUVE ... start a small business when you cannot fire useless employees and hire fresh new talent.
Jan 3, 2014 - According to Zappos executives, the move is an effort to keep the ... from becoming too rigid, too unwieldy and too bureaucratic as it grows.
Jan 16, 2013 - This notion took time to catch on in the British. Isles: 400 years later a Christian scribe, Gerald of Wales, was horrified to see an Ulster king.
Nov 28, 2013 - Whatever you may think of the value of IQ tests, it is surely relevant to a ... being given a good enough chance to rustle and hustle their way to ...
Jan 5, 2013 - Maraval of the Wild Bunch company. Mr Maraval's ... films which feature the âbankable namesâ which supposedly ensure high audience figures.
richest have fallen in 29 out of 30 countries for which data are available, said the report. This "capture of opportunities" by the rich at the expense of the poor and ...
Feb 7, 2013 - to play with the technology, using educational software. ... Couldn't the child get the same information from Google in five to 10 minutes?".
Dec 4, 2013 - We say they need only to be âgood enoughâ, and that an important way ... are unpredictable you can't expect people to set a goal and say you ...