α θA α θ - Nicolas Mouquet

Modelling the relationship between a pitcher plant (Sarracenia purpurea) and its phytotelma community: 1. 1 ... can calculate the proportion of nitrogen that is collected by the plant from the detritus: ... Juniper, B. E., R. J. Robins, and D. M. Joel.
27KB taille 1 téléchargements 56 vues
Functional Ecology 1

APPENDIX S2 : Nitrogen budget for the plant

2 3

To understand how much nitrogen Sarracenia purpurea can really get from prey

4

decomposition, we can use the available data and our model to compare the effects of the

5

input of nitrogen from the different sources available to the plant.

6 7

(1) We have found that the capture rate varies a great deal from leaf to leaf in the same

8

field (from θA = 1.08 to 63.36 mg of carbon per liter and per day; appendix 1). This is not

9

surprising since it is known that the capture rate varies with leaf age, height, and exposure

10

(Cresswell 1991, Miller and Kneitel 2005) and prey availability (Wolfe 1981). Based on

11

our model equations and numerical values we have collected (Table 1, appendix 1), we

12

can calculate the proportion of nitrogen that is collected by the plant from the detritus:

13

N % = ( yN * / θ Aα ) *100 = 10.3% . Thus, the quantity of nitrogen potentially captured by

14

the plant through prey decomposition of organic detritus ( θ A N % α ) varies from 0.0167

15

to 0.985 mg of nitrogen per liter and per day.

16 17

(2) Sarracenia purpurea grows in bogs and other nutrient-poor soils that receive

18

inorganic nutrients inputs mostly through precipitation (Siegel and Glaser 1987, Juniper

19

et al. 1989) collected by its leaf (Ellison and Gotelli 2002). Based on estimation of NO3-

20

and NH4+ concentration in atmospheric deposition (Ollinger et al. 1993) we have found

21

estimation for nitrogen input into the pitcher through precipitation to be between 0.06 and

22

0.08 mg of nitrogen per liter and per day (appendix 1).

23 Modelling the relationship between a pitcher plant (Sarracenia purpurea) and its phytotelma community: 1 mutualism or parasitism? Nicolas Mouquet, Tanguy Daufresne, Sarah M. Grayand and Thomas E. Miller

Functional Ecology

24

(3) It has been shown that bacterial dinitrogen fixation could occur in the leaf of S.

25

purpurea and may represent a substantial source of nitrogen to the plant (Prankevicius

26

and Cameron 1991). These authors found that the maximum nitrogen yield in a leaf was

27

20.37 mg of N fixed per liter and per day (appendix 1). This nitrogen fixation will only

28

indirectly benefit the plant, through nitrogen enrichment via bacterial excretion and

29

mortality. It is difficult to estimate this indirect effect but it can be used as a max value.

30

Our data show that the flux of nitrogen from detritus to bacteria compartments is about

31

100 times lower than this value ( u B BD α = (0.00105*371.25*5)/6.62 = 0.29 mg of N

32

fixed per liter and per day). Prankevicius and Cameron’s value seems anormally high and

33

must thus be interpreted carefully but illustrates the potential of nitrogen production by

34

bacterial dinitrogen fixation.

35 36

(4) Individuals of Sarracenia purpurea probably receive very little nitrogen through their

37

roots systems (Juniper et al. 1989, Ellison and Gotelli 2002). The utilization of N source

38

in the soil is greatly dependent on pH and the kind of environments where this plant

39

grows, which are naturally very acidic. In the sandy, low pH (mean of 4.7, sd = 0.7) soils

40

of N. Florida, pitcher plant roots are very reduced and appear to serve primarily for

41

support.

42 43

Literature cited :

44

Modelling the relationship between a pitcher plant (Sarracenia purpurea) and its phytotelma community: 2 mutualism or parasitism? Nicolas Mouquet, Tanguy Daufresne, Sarah M. Grayand and Thomas E. Miller

Functional Ecology

45

Ellison, A. M., and N. J. Gotelli. (2002). Nitrogen availability alters the expression of

46

carnivory in the northern pitcher plant, Sarracenia purpurea. Proceedings of the

47

National Academy of Science, U.S.A., 99, 4409-4412.

48 49 50

Juniper, B. E., R. J. Robins, and D. M. Joel. (1989). The carnivorous plants. Academic Press, London. Ollinger, S. V., J. D. Aber, G. M. Lovett, S. E. Millham, R. G. Lathrop, and J. M. Ellis.

51

(1993). A Spatial Model of Atmospheric Deposition for the Northeastern U.S.

52

Ecological applications, 3, 459-472.

53

Prankevicius, A. B., and D. M. Cameron. (1991). Bacterial dinitrogen fixation in the leaf

54

of the northern pitcher plant (Sarracenia purpurea). Canadian Journal of Botany,

55

69, 2296-2298.

56 57 58

Siegel, D. I., and P. H. Glaser. (1987). Groundwater Flow in a Bog-Fen Complex, Lost River Peatland, Northern Minnesota. Journal of ecology, 75, 743-754. Wolfe, L. M. (1981). Feeding Behavior of a Plant: Differential Prey Capture in Old and

59

New Leaves of the Pitcher Plant (Sarracenia purpurea). American Midland

60

Naturalist, 106, 352-359.

61 62 63

Modelling the relationship between a pitcher plant (Sarracenia purpurea) and its phytotelma community: 3 mutualism or parasitism? Nicolas Mouquet, Tanguy Daufresne, Sarah M. Grayand and Thomas E. Miller